Subject:
|
Re: Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 May 2001 21:56:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
733 times
|
| |
|
|
"Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message
news:GCtx8C.8C3@lugnet.com...
> Sorry it took so long for me to get this back.
>
> I scoured my sources and all of the Internet databases I know of, and as far
> as I can tell, you are free and clear on all of these extensions:
>
> .ldr
> .ldl
> .lds
> .mpd
> .mlc
Cool.
I'd prefer the primary file extension to reflect the 'LDraw' name - 'ldr.'
Some further discussion may be in order about DAT files having more than just
the .ldr extension - because of certain features of certain programs. I don't
think we should go overboard, though.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Proposal
|
| (...) We could introduce a new meta-statement to track to the language extensions used by a model file. This would allow .dat, .ldl, .mpd, and .mlc files to all use a single extension. The .lds format is different enough that it should have a unique (...) (24 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Proposal
|
| Sorry it took so long for me to get this back. I scoured my sources and all of the Internet databases I know of, and as far as I can tell, you are free and clear on all of these extensions: .ldr .ldl .lds .mpd .mlc I wonder if someone didn't do this (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
