Subject:
|
Re: Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 May 2001 13:44:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
994 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney wrote:
> "Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message
> news:GCtx8C.8C3@lugnet.com...
> > Sorry it took so long for me to get this back.
> >
> > I scoured my sources and all of the Internet databases I know of, and as far
> > as I can tell, you are free and clear on all of these extensions:
> >
> > .ldr
> > .ldl
> > .lds
> > .mpd
> > .mlc
>
> Cool.
>
> I'd prefer the primary file extension to reflect the 'LDraw' name - 'ldr.'
>
> Some further discussion may be in order about DAT files having more than just
> the .ldr extension - because of certain features of certain programs. I don't
> think we should go overboard, though.
We could introduce a new meta-statement to track to the language extensions used
by a model file. This would allow .dat, .ldl, .mpd, and .mlc files to all use a
single extension. The .lds format is different enough that it should have a
unique extension.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Proposal
|
| "Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:GCtx8C.8C3@lugnet.com... (...) Cool. I'd prefer the primary file extension to reflect the 'LDraw' name - 'ldr.' Some further discussion may be in order about DAT files having more than (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
