Subject:
|
Re: Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 May 2001 21:16:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
543 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Gino A. Melone wrote:
> I've had a few thoughts on what the extension could be, but I'm not attached
> to any of them. So, thoughts?
How about these:
ldr - LDraw (dat) files
mpd - Multi-Part lDraw files
ldl - files with LDLite language extensions
lds - LDScript files
mlc - files with MLCad language extensions
Steve
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Proposal
|
| "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:k3u0ftckudqbaaf...4ax.com... (...) attached (...) I've been a proponent of .ldr whenever it has come up. I like that, and the other extensions you propose. -Tim (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Proposal
|
| (...) I think we should settle for mpd. Let's not bring another extention into this to cause even more confusion. One can always use .mpd on an LDraw file, even if it does not contain any "FILE" keywords, right? So there are no problems related to (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Proposal
|
| I've got a bit of a problem with the LDraw derived software. I love the tools I use. My problem is with the unfortunate choice of filename extension. When LDraw/LEdit were written, it didn't really matter much. However, nowadays file (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
