|
 | | Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
| (...) I'm not sure how to quantify 'usefulness' of a line command. If you want to make outlines on simulated curved surfaces in LDraw, conditional lines are vital. I can't think of another to accomplish this task. And making the outlines is fairly (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| | Re: numbers report
|
| BTW, you can now get this report on the homepage for the Parts Tracker. (URL). It's at the bottom; you might have to scroll down. Steve "Doing what I can to make the world a better place" Bliss (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| | Updated website!
|
| After a growing amount of information which I wanted to put on my website, I reorganized the menu structure and made a few new pages. There is a lot of new information on out-of-date pages (like my bio page); almost every page has been updated! My (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.878)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| | Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
| (...) I believe that there are other ways to put these lines in, as long as you are *only* planning on using them to show the 'visible' edge of a curved surface. This is actually a question I've been meaning to ask around here, Have type5 lines been (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| | Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
| (...) Thanks for that explanation, however I think we still need to include type 5 lines in parts, so that programs which don't implement this technique (eg ldraw) can still display the curved edges correctly. Programs which do implement it can (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| | Why Type 5 Lines?
|
| What is the point of Type 5 lines? It seems to me that they are a confusing and clunky method to display lines for the visible edges of rounded objects when having no line at all would be just as visually correct (and less taxing on the brain to (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| | numbers report
|
| (URL) certified files. 28 files need admin review. 189 files need more votes. 287 have uncertified subfiles. 99 held files. (Total: 623) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| | LDraw Monopole? [DAT]
|
| I haven't asked a dumb question in at least fifteen minutes, so here goes: I'm writing a part, and in it I'm using the following info: 0 1 16 0 0 0 0 1 0 7.33 0 0 0 0 7.33 ring3.dat 0 The object shows up just fine in L3Lab, but when I run it through (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Wrapping up 2002-02
|
| (...) would be a *bad* idea to move Vader's torso to ps4, since his face couldn't follow. So Vader needs a new pattern code entirely. But it's a bigger problem than just Vader's code. Obi-wan the Hermit has already been released with two different (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| | Re: rebuttal...
|
| (...) Hello Franklin, Hello Steve, I pray so that you stay or return to concordance. I can not imagine LDraw without you. I am sure there is nothing personal so there must be a way back to a friendly cooperative work. The Part Tracker would have no (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| | Problems submitting upadeted versions of official parts?
|
| How do I go about submitting upadted versions of officail parts? I have sent a few to parts@ldraw.org, but have yet to see any of them appear on the tracker. Maybe they should have several people in charge of looking over parts submitted to this (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| | LDraw Webring
|
| Now that Webring is no longer owned by Yahoo, can we please reactivated all the Lego related Webrings? They provide a lot traffic to my sites not to mention being a good centralized place to find all the other LDraw creators pages. -Orion (make it (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.877)
|
|
| | Re: rebuttal...
|
| Since I was appealed to in Franklin's email and post, I am adding my comments in reply to some of the posts here. Steve knows this, but it might not be public knowledge -- I do not get involved in the trenches when it comes to parts. Steve has (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.876)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.876)
|
