|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
| | Re: Ldglite bug report (Was: Portable Ldraw system)
|
| (...) Those are indeed the generic Windows drivers. The Trident web-site says the i-7 only has accelerated 3D drivers for 98 and ME, and the GL_RENDERER string agrees. (...) Generic opengl and it took about 15 seconds to render. Are you using the l3 (...) (22 years ago, 17-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
| | Re: Ldglite bug report (Was: Portable Ldraw system)
|
| (...) Some of that really sounds like driver problems to me. What does ldglite print out about your opengl drivers? Maybe you're not using the Microsoft Software opengl drivers after all, but rather some brain dead half implemented OEM drivers. Do (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
| | Ldglite bug report (Was: Portable Ldraw system)
|
| (...) Yeah I've known about the problems with the menu for quite a while now. I refuse to go to a 1.0 release number until I fix that. However since I'm running out of release numbers I've actually started to do something about it. Could you give me (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
| | Re: Yet another idea - Portable Ldraw system
|
| Well, sounds like a plan. There are a few things that you can do to make it easier and maybe faster. I for one would definately network the computers. All you will need is 2 NICs (Network Interface Cards) a hub or switch (preferably a switch) and (...) (22 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
| | Re: MPD spec
|
| (...) Because we ought to differentiate between files that can be processed directly by LDraw, and those which have to be filtered through another tool (a MPD splitter) before LDraw can render them. If we decide to scrap LDraw compatibility, this is (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.284) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.283) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.283) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.283) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.283) |
|
| | Re: Heraldry Terms
|
| (...) Well, heraldry terms and technical names for objects are always good. I'm looking for any words that people might reasonably use to search for a part. You can check the patterned parts on these pages: (URL) you click the link on each (...) (22 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.283) |
|
| | Re: MPD spec
|
| (...) Or perhaps MPD and LD2. We have discussed the time for a new, not LDraw compatible standard years ago. I don't like the idea of an "almost LDraw compatible" standard. Isn't it better to go all the way with maybe type 6, 7, 8... commands than (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.283) |