|
 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) Everyone who is interested in LDraw related stuff is part of the community. The LDraw community has some official organizations like LDraw.org and soon to be the LSC. It is my understanding that anyone who wants to vote for the nominees (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | Re: Ldraw.Org Spec 1.0.0 Page
|
| (...) Hi Orion - Thanks for getting this up. I have a couple observations/questions... You incorporate the original LDraw spec in here (which should be included), but will we draw a distinction between original language LDraw/LEdit will recognize (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | I can't send James Reynolds mail
|
| James, I got two messages from you, so I replied that your messages got through. Both messages bounced back. Here is a compy of one of the messages that bounced back. From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@smtp....l.rcn.net> Date: Thu May 15, (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I think it had many good ideas in it, indeed! (...) While I agree in general, I think the leadership of LDraw.org should not be part of this proposal. The LSC can easily start it's work, while the community works out the whole official org (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) This last suggestion sounds like having a membership packet. I like the idea of having a membership package, possibly packaged with a CD of current LDraw editors, tools, library, (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | mailing list linkage
|
| (...) Aha -- yes, that would work too -- and is extremely easy to set up. In fact, if you wanted to make it read-only on LUGNET (so that the only way to post is via the mailing list on ldraw.org), all we need to do is subscribe an address (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| I think it's time to post the 0.99 draft of the LSC proposal. I've pasted it below with mo revision marks. You can see an HTML document _with_ revision marks here: (URL) think we're 99% of the way there to having a final draft - and if there are no (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | Re: LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
| (...) The thing is, right now they are LDraw.org. Do you prefer that we just refer to LDraw.org, without the names? I think it is important that LSC is under the LDraw.org umbrella. I invite you to start a new topic on moving from ad-hoc LDraw.org (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | Re: Ldraw.Org Spec 1.0.0 Page
|
| (...) Alright here's the deal. The ultimate aim of the LSC is to compile and consolidate all of the LDraw related file format definitions into one document (1.0.0) and then, once the initial work is done, solicit ideas to further extend or modify (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I don't think that what Kyle is describing is what I have in mind. LDraw.org is the natural group to designate that their will be an LSC committee. The committee is made up of "technically qualified" members. Only members of LDraw.org that are (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | The big question
|
| No, I'm not getting married. ;-) All of this LDraw standards and organization talk has gotten me thinking...about LDraw.org and it's mission, if you will. So I'd like to throw out a question: What do you think LDraw.org's role is in the LDraw/LEGO (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | Moving LDraw.org permanently to Peeron?
|
| What does people think about moving LDraw.org permanently to Peeron? I have discussed the problem a bit with Dan and Jennifer and they seem to be positive towards the idea, as long as we can distribute the heavy traffic (downloading the complete (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) Putting on my legal hat: Notice that the draft proposal refers to "the LDraw Community", not the LEGO community. LDraw stands for LEGO Draw, which is the only time the word LEGO is used in the entire draft, so I'm not sure where you think that (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) How about this: Requirements for LSC Membership To ensure only competent, dedicated, and active contributors become members of the LSC, they shall have met one or more of the following requirements: - Authored an LDraw part subsequently (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.313)
|
