To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 9427
9426  |  9428
Subject: 
Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 02:44:06 GMT
Viewed: 
2194 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tore Eriksson wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky wrote:
The LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) has recently discussed the issue of
embedded POV-Ray code in Official Parts Library files.  After careful
consideration and with inputs from leading non-LSC members, most notably Lars
Hassing and Chris Dee, we have agreed that the inclusion of this code is
undesirable.


Before we make a final decision regarding this matter, we would like to open
this discussion up to the LDraw community as a whole.  Please be constructive
with your comments.

- The LSC

Too sad. If I got that complicated language correcly, this means that the
problem presented at http://www.hassings.dk/l3/l3p.html#primsubst and was solved
by embedded POV-code has now regressed to be un-solved again.

/Tore

Actually, the only Official Library parts that have embedded P-R SDL are some of
Paul Easter torus primitives.  Since nothing was ever done in the first place,
nothing is being undone now.  If you're like me and frustrated that LGEO is
incomplete and not actively being updated, please join onto the LDrawPOV
project:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/ldrawpov

Lars is already implementing support for this project in L3P 1.4

-Orion



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) What's entailed? Do you want participants who can test but not do much else? (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) The relatively easy solution on how to make the wrench tool and, even more obvious, the (unofficial) patterned maxifig heads - that solution has become undone. (...) The only thing that ever has frustrated me about LGEO is that I never ever (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) Lars has already been implementing that support since... what year? 2004? Probably even longer. I may would have joined it, but it didn't work then and I still can't get it to work now, 3½ years later. (tried testdoc.pov) And, like I said, (...) (17 years ago, 1-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) Too sad. If I got that complicated language correcly, this means that the problem presented at (URL) and was solved by embedded POV-code has now regressed to be un-solved again. /Tore (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

27 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR