 | | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) Or improve one or more pieces of software to keep track of pieces like this. Steve (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
What is LDS (sorry if I am being obtuse)? Also what is the exact behavior of INCLUDE? I assume the line will look like: 0 INCLUDE /include/file/path And if I remember correctly all the parts in the file are loaded into memory for use but not drawn. (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
Hi :-) I thought a bit about all this stud talk and reached a conclusion: is not worth the effort. I mean, nobody includes a touch sensor in it's model, in this case a transparent touch sensor, if does not intend to use it. And if you want to use (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDlite "Black" not really Black...
|
|
(...) I tried that already, and it looks kind of strange, especially for transparent parts. For some reason, it just doesn't seem to look like the real instructions (IMO). Maybe I'm just too used to the default LDraw look...especially because the (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) Maybe this is one place where using a short-cut file would make sense. WE could place the actual file (XXXX.DAT) in the Bar category, and then name the SW version (which would just call the Bar file) XXXXA.DAT. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
(...) I guess I'm not a a standard user. :-) To me the objective should be to accurately represent the real world, not to copy the LEGO instructions. (...) My point of view also disagrees here. Studs of real transparent parts are hollow, at least in (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: maandag 29 maart 1999 16:55 Subject: Re: Complete list of metacommands? (...) Steve, could you supply us with a (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Default extensions
|
|
Is anyone else bugged by the DAT extension? Does anyone else use other extensions for various flavors of (near-)LDraw source files? I stick with DAT for vanilla LDraw files. For other files files, I've been using: LDL - LDLite extensions (especially (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) the (...) At least "Star Wars people" would not have to go looking for it. Someone using the part who is unfamiliar with Star Wars sets might never think to look for it there. That's the basic problem with theme-based nomenclature. It makes (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
|
(...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) blade (...) to (...) I would disagree with you here, Steve, and agree with Jonathan on this one. For this purpose it should be next to the hilt so people don't have to go searching for it. Keep Building!! -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
(...) These two comment meta-commands are not currently recognized by any programs, AFAIK. They are both part-file meta-commands, intended for use by part-search and part-catalog programs. CATEGORY specifies the part's category. I think all the (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) No, it should be called 'Bar 4L'. That is the best description of what the piece *is*, rather than what it is currently being used *for*. Steve (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
We really need to have a program with a configurable INCLUDE path. So we can add to the default of: %ldraw%\p;%ldraw%\pa...;%current% Then we could go nuts with subdirectories. Well, sort of. Steve (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
(...) These parts won't be much use for a study, because I wrote a utility program to generate higher-resolution curve/ring sections. Steve (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDlite "Black" not really Black...
|
|
Wow, cool. :) Now I just have to create a script to set the edge-color for everything to pure black. And I'm going to edit my stud.dat and stud2.dat files, to put pure-black sides on all the studs. Too bad that messes up a few parts which use studs (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Ben Bennett <sink@ayup.limey.net> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 19:26 Subject: Complete list of metacommands? (...) what (...) I've seen CATEGORY and KEYWORD, (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Laurentino Martins <lau@mail.telepac.pt> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 21:33 Subject: Studs (...) It turned out this was the case for all electric contact (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Touch Sensor
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Paul Gyugyi <paul@gyugyi.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: zondag 28 maart 1999 1:36 Subject: Re: New Touch Sensor I wrote: This is a known problem with dithered colours: If you (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How much is too much?
|
|
(...) Sorry missed the relevance of this (the classic space helmet part) first time around. I'll try and take a critical look at it tonight. My initial comment to save bytes would be to round the co-ordinates off to three decimal places - at most (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
