 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Jeff Boen
|
| | | (...) in all honesty, all i use LDraw for... to document my creations so that i have a record before i tear them apart... the only reason i model specific elements for the catalog is because i want/need them to document a RL model (well, sometimes (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | (...) I agree wholeheartedly... The point I tried to make earlier, was that it seems that by giveing seperate part numbers to the part, TLG is leaveing open the possibility in the future to release a part that is in two SEPARATE colors. So, my (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | | | (...) that (...) possibility (...) question (...) great point.. and well thought-out... hmmmm... okay... so then as i see it we have two options.. #1 (my preference, since this is how we handle two halves of every hinge, wheel-tyre combo, etc.. (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Just to be a pain: there are existing 'glued-together' parts in LDraw with sub-files for each component part and a main short-cut file for the whole thing. Two that spring to mind are the 2x2x11 pillar and the classic 2x4 plate hinge. (...) (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | | | (...) hehe.. i can always count on you to be a pain, steve... :) every morning i come in here and check this thread and i can see everyone's point with equal value... i started in on this convo from the standpoint of "2 #16 parts, then aggregate (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | (...) True. As the best way to keep everyone at least somewhat happy. (...) I don't want to over-use 3-digit numbers. Only where necessary and unavoidable. For instance; The complete yellow dinghy does have the correct number. So we can make a (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Roy Earls
|
| | | | | onyx wrote in message ... (...) you're (...) don't (...) the (...) that (...) basic (...) to (...) LDraw (...) that (...) i (...) You've got my support here. I don't care to use LDraw as a TLG reference ...just wanna model. We need to follow the (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) ^^^...^^^ Agreed, except that in the case of the 1x2 brick -- there are two molds still in use today: one with a post down the center and one without. The one without the post is of course the one used for little windows -- like in (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | (...) agreed again... my point being that TLG *may* use different element numbers to differentiate between certain parts in different colors (perhaps not 1x2 bricks) but that our concern should only be separate part numbers when the physical makeup (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
