 | | Re: Error in 2357.dat (or in LDGLite)
|
|
(...) Well it renders the same way in l3lab so it's a bug in the part. I think the problem is that the inside surface is missing. This lets us see through to the outside surface of the 2357 brick which occupies the exact same space as the outside (...) (24 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Error in 2357.dat (or in LDGLite) [DAT]
|
|
There seems to be an error in 2357.dat (or in LDGLite). It looks like the winding has been swapped for some of the sides, so the wrong surfaces are drawn. This is only visible in some special cases. When you render the example below with LDGLite (...) (24 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | colour
|
|
What would be the proper Ldraw colour code for "Teal" (The "Cybermaster colour")? Kind regards John Jensen (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Trying to locate some parts
|
|
Bet I can outdo Sproat on this:) I have ALL the Rockraider sets (except those japaneese ones) and I like it:) I'm trying to locate some parts for a inventory I'm building. The set number is 4940 The legs: in step 6 there's a 1X2 brick with a clip (...) (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on transparent printed parts
|
|
(...) Yes, you canread about it here: (URL) (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on transparent printed parts
|
|
John: (...) I think Lars has modified l3p, so you can included a POV-Ray version of the part as comments in the DAT file. Something like "0 IFPOV/.../0 ELSEPOV/.../0 ENDPOV", but check Lars' latest l3p announcement. Play well, Jacob -- Where's that (...) (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on transparent printed parts
|
|
(...) Right now, there's nowhere to go with POV-Ray. Well, maybe you could donate them to Lutz Uhlman's LGEO parts library, maybe. What I'd like to see happen is for the permanent l-cad organization setup an LDraw-compatible library of POV-Ray (...) (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts needed
|
|
(oops, I posted this to the wrong group initially) Hey ya parts authors, I confess that yes, I own a few Town Jr. sets. There. *That's* out of the way. Razz away, but in a separate thread please. ;-) I'm looking for someone to create the following (...) (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on transparent printed parts
|
|
(...) I've actually given this some thought too, and has considered now that I have time again to do some legos to make a povray version for each lcad version I make. But what to do with it? Kind regards John Jensen (24 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on transparent printed parts
|
|
(...) Yah, that'd be the way to go. Steve (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Question on transparent printed parts
|
|
Earlier today, I posted a 1x6 brick with the text "Shell" printed on it. I also have a version of this piece that is printed on a clear 1x6. And I'm trying to figure out how to model that in LDraw. Is there any way to control the alpha level of a (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on (unneeded?) lines in printed parts
|
|
(...) Type 2 lines should not be used to outline the decorated areas on printed parts, so their use in 3010p06 is incorrect. To improve the look of the part when rendered by some of the older LCAD software, it is acceptable to define type 2 lines (...) (24 years ago, 2-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on (unneeded?) lines in printed parts
|
|
(...) It's a backward compatibility issue: a. These lines help to identify the various printed pieces in Ledit, which does show the parts as wireframes only. b. In a Ldraw render, it prevents the background color bits "eating up" the pattern color (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on (unneeded?) lines in printed parts
|
|
"Tony Hafner" <hafhead@PANTSplanetquake.com> wrote in message news:G8238J.HGI@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) side. (...) a (...) rotate (...) help (...) directory, (...) are (...) No. Edgelines should only be used for: edges. -John Van (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where to download LGEO?
|
|
"Ahui Herrera" <jedi_agh@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G83EnI.IKK@lugnet.com... (...) -Tim (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where to download LGEO?
|
|
You can find the LGEO files at: (URL) Herrera (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Where to download LGEO?
|
|
Hi - I was just asked by someone where they could get LGEO, after pointing them to the L2P download page on LDraw.org, I discovered the links are broken. They link to Lutz's old site, but his new one - www.el-lutzo.de - is down. Is there anywhere (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Question on (unneeded?) lines in printed parts
|
|
I have noticed recently that some printed parts have edges around all the printed bits. For example, look at 3010p06.dat. This is a 1x4 with stripes on one side. But between each red stripe and its neighboring bgcolor stripe, there is a light-red (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Democracy (Was: next parts vote/update - when???)
|
|
(...) Almost all aspects of a part can be brushed upon later, should a faulty part be officialized. Bow-tie quads, syntax errors, header errors and bad names. All can easily be fixed later on. There is one aspect, however, which simply cannot be (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Democracy (Was: next parts vote/update - when???)
|
|
"Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> wrote in message news:3A77FB68.4FD03E...pnet.se... (...) obvious Leader. Let's say one trusted authority, (...) obvious flaws set aside. Then run L3P -check and (...) officialize those that passed (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
