Subject:
|
Re: Democracy (Was: next parts vote/update - when???)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:36:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
451 times
|
| |
|
|
"Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@mbox325.swipnet.se> wrote in message
news:3A77FB68.4FD03E61@mbox325.swipnet.se...
> What about a little less democracy? Like in the days when James was the • obvious Leader. Let's say one trusted authority,
> Steve, Lars, anyone-else? looks at the part one at the time. Parts with • obvious flaws set aside. Then run L3P -check and
> exclude parts with critical errors, like "1-3-2-4-quads". Then simply • officialize those that passed the tests. Or sent
> to a Header Guru that formats the headers according to the guidelines before • officializing. Of course, mistakes will be
> done, but they can be corrected the next update. I think the obvious drawbacks • with this procedure is outweighed by the
> drawback of having so many unofficial parts pending.
>
> This could be a temporary solution to get back in pace with the updates, or
from now on if it turns out more effective.
I've discussed with Steve about a new method of doing the parts update. He
wants to change it into a different system without a vote - ie small group of
people who inspect and approve - and allow parts into updates as soon as they're
approved. We have to do a bit of structuring the org first (which we have
decided on, waiting for an announcement to be posted) and then we can/will
attack that system.
Eventually parts updates will go a lot smoother, and parts will be officialized
easier and quicker.
About the org, I can't go into more detail until we've formulated an
announcement, and I hope that happens soon.
--
Tim Courtney - tim@ldraw.org
http://www.ldraw.org - Centralized LDraw Resources
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Democracy (Was: next parts vote/update - when???)
|
| What about a little less democracy? Like in the days when James was the obvious Leader. Let's say one trusted authority, Steve, Lars, anyone-else? looks at the part one at the time. Parts with obvious flaws set aside. Then run L3P -check and exclude (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
