Subject:
|
Re: Democracy (Was: next parts vote/update - when???)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:45:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
578 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Fredrik Glöckner writes:
> There is one aspect, however, which simply cannot be fixed later on.
> This is the insertion point and rotation of the part. Having a parts
> library without a consistent insertion point/rotation regime is kinda
> sad.
Um, me too.
It's extremely frustrating to work with some parts in the library due to
these inconsistencies -- immediate examples include <part:30079> and several
minifig accessories, not to mention the goofy assortment of rotation axes
among the wheels and gears.
Cheers,
- jsproat
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Democracy (Was: next parts vote/update - when???)
|
| (...) Has this been suggested before: I understand that altering a zero point or rotation orientation will break models. But what if a new part were assigned at that time, and the old number referenced the new number (with appropriate transformation (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Democracy (Was: next parts vote/update - when???)
|
| (...) Almost all aspects of a part can be brushed upon later, should a faulty part be officialized. Bow-tie quads, syntax errors, header errors and bad names. All can easily be fixed later on. There is one aspect, however, which simply cannot be (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
