Subject:
|
Re: Seams like a problem
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 13:15:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1010 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs writes:
> I think I was misunderstanding the situation. I thought that it was being
> reported that L3P/L3Lab were putting seams between subparts, when that
> apparently only happens when you open the part directly, causing it to be
> unaware that the top-level model is a part.
The first time I noticed it was while rendering in POV-ray a part for which
the .pov file was generated via L3P. The part consisted of four identical
subparts meeting at (0,0,0). I mirrored the subpart in the manner of
8-8sphe.dat, so that the single subpart was repeated four times. When I
ran POV-ray, a seam appeared between each pair of subparts, though I don't
believe these seams were present in the DAT file itself, nor in the display of
L3Lab. It's possible, as I mentioned elsewhere, that I haven't lined up the
subparts precisely, and, while the gap might be invisible in L3Lab, it shows
up clearly on POV-ray.
I didn't have the chance to generate the .pov last night; I'll try again
tonight, as well as examining the DAT file to make sure alignment isn't a
factor.
Dave!
(by the way, thanks for your help on my "gappy spheroids" problem; despite the
fact that I wasn't explaining my problem clearly, your explanation made me
realize what I was doing wrong!)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Seams like a problem
|
| "Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:G2AJD0.KAC@lugnet.com... (...) v1.0 (...) and (...) are (...) If you have a part which references a subpart which references another subpart (not likely, true), you don't want to shrink (...) (25 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
