 | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
|
(...) OK, that sounds reasonable -- it's something that a clean-up program could look for, even though it's not practical for a rendering program to do the same. Steve (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) Whew! Only one of those files is mine! :\ (...) True. (...) I don't think that's necessary. If a subfile is not certified, then the renderer will not apply BFC processing to the subfile. Besides, if having all subfiles certified was a (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Smoke-Clear color code (was: Problem with 1-4con1.dat)
|
|
(...) I don't think there is a sanctioned color-code yet ... checking ... checking ... nope, nothing in the color table in the FAQ. Hear Ye! Hear Ye! Unless someone complains otherwise, the proper LDraw color-code for 'smoked-transparent', AKA (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
(...) I'd say it would be ok even then, imo. (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
|
|
(...) There was a discussion about this awhile ago. Since LDraw will interpret these lines as subfile commands, the lines are syntactically correct. Badly formed, but not invalid. And 754.dat is getting fixed in the 2000-01 update! Steve (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
|
|
Hi, I just noticed that L3Lab interpreted the following lines as real lines, not as comments: 01 16 0 -2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat 01 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat I sent a mail to Lars to notify him of this small "bug", but then it (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
|
|
(...) errors. (...) common (...) these (...) let (...) Having now looked in more detail at the torsos, I will probably modify this proposal. On the torsos the _shield_ is a very different shape and scale to the shield part. The actual wolf and black (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
(...) I get ya. It is ok to make any lego part untill or unless TLG says otherwise. (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
(...) Thanks for clearing that up! In that case, I'll submit the 756.dat I just posted to lugnet.cad.dat.parts to Steve Bliss. Since it is an improvement of an existing part, it shouldn't require a vote, right? Fredrik (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message news:qrd7lduwl4w.fsf....uio.no... (...) I updated the 754.dat to make it more realistic, but obviously failed to do so for 756. Feel free to improve the 756.dat! -John Van (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
(...) AFAIK, TLG hasn't said anything officially regarding LDraw or its parts libraries. I believe LDraw as a freeware program is well within its rights to contain SW elements as well. They aren't making official statements about it (IMO) because (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I meant to say "no point _for_me_ to discuss anymore". Sorry for sounding harsh. (...) I still don't agree. But as I said (or rather meant to say, English isn't my primary language, so I sometimes goof) we probably don't need to discuss this (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I only used eight, to simplify the drawing, which was made by hand. (...) All I say is that the benefits from it overweight the extra effort. (...) Correct, Can't argue with that ! But this problem surfaces, due to the intrinsic polygonized (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with 1-4con1.dat
|
|
(...) I am using the color definitions from Anton's Lego library and these are the closest to real Lego colors i have seen. The only exception is black and transparent black that should be <0.2,0.2,0.2> Georg (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
What is the official view of lego on the ldraw rendering program and parts library? Does TLG have anything to say about the library? Is there anything that TLG would like us not to make and put into the library (e.g. some of the "star wars (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) LDraw code? With a circular shape having 16 segments, not eight as in your diagrams. If you think that is simpler for the parts authors (or that it requires a "tiny extra effort") as compared to superimposing a quad and a disc (two lines of (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
Hi, I've been working a bit with flexible hoses lately, and I've noticed an odd thing about the parts which make up the bent version of the 8.5L flexible hose. The part 754.dat (URL) used as a hose segment, about 50 of them go into a single hose. (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) Auch, another error? Thank you, Lars, I'll fix it and send it to Steve Bliss, hopefully making it to the next update. Fredrik (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
