Subject:
|
Re: Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:31:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
559 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Fredrik Glöckner writes:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that L3Lab interpreted the following lines as real lines,
> not as comments:
>
> 01 16 0 -2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat
> 01 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat
>
> I sent a mail to Lars to notify him of this small "bug", but then it
> occured to me that the bug might be in the part itself.
>
> Is the above excerpt from the file 754.dat syntactically right or wrong?
There was a discussion about this awhile ago. Since LDraw will interpret
these lines as subfile commands, the lines are syntactically correct. Badly
formed, but not invalid.
And 754.dat is getting fixed in the 2000-01 update!
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
|
| Hi, I just noticed that L3Lab interpreted the following lines as real lines, not as comments: 01 16 0 -2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat 01 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat I sent a mail to Lars to notify him of this small "bug", but then it (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
