Subject:
|
Re: CW/CCW, vertex sequence, co-planar, convex, (115kB)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Oct 1999 13:05:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1178 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999 18:28:12 GMT, "Gary Williams" <graywolf@pcpros.net>
wrote:
> But more often than not, when mirroring an element or subassembly, it's not
> the intent of the author to turn it inside out. Typical model builders
> shouldn't concern themselves with inversion, which should happen totally
> behind the scenes.
True. But mirroring is an advanced technique. Well, maybe
intermediate-level. Anyway, it's not for beginners.
> Parts authors will be the primary group of people who care about inversion.
True. Allowing mirroring/inversion for parts authors allows them to use a
single set of primitives, while keeping part-files smaller
So which would be worse, making things a bit more complicated for
power-modelers in uncommon cases, or making things a bit more complicated
for part-authors in somewhat common cases?
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: CW/CCW, vertex sequence, co-planar, convex, (115kB)
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <37f9f5c6.74291430@l...et.com>... (...) not (...) inversion. (...) For WizardCAD I was intending to change the behavior of the mirror functions depending on what type of file the user opened the file as. If they open a (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: CW/CCW, vertex sequence, co-planar, convex, (115kB)
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <37f8c86b.239282689@...et.com>... (...) But more often than not, when mirroring an element or subassembly, it's not the intent of the author to turn it inside out. Typical model builders shouldn't concern themselves (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
53 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
