| | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) Tim, Steve is speaking from a very wise standpoint (on many levels). You can never go wrong by offering to host things that people voluntarily contribute. But if people start to get the feeling that there is pressure to contribute or to let go (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) True. But it shouldn't be an immediate goal of ours. There's a couple things that hold importance here, the download area and the OMR. Once we get the ball rolling on these we can work on that. Anyways, Steve has a point. But something as (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: medium-sized ship hulls
|
|
which ones are these? are these the ones that are used for example on the new adventurers jungle boat? (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) LDraw and LEdit do not support other directories. Well, they do, sort of. They will look for sub-files in the following locations: - ldraw\p - ldraw\parts - ldraw\models - current directory The last search option is what allows most programs (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) When LDAO starts moving (temporary) files in and out of ldraw\models, what should it do about the files already there? And what if the user launches model1\main.dat into LEdit, but then opens model2\main.dat into l3p? (...) In the File Save (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | medium-sized ship hulls
|
|
is there anyone out there that is working on the medium-sized ship hulls (fore and aft)? i have some truly terrible mock-ups i've made from bricks and plates but i thought i'd check with the professionals before proceeding with a project. thanks (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <37714eef.19012626@l...et.com>... (...) and (...) Ship1.dat (...) Unless you use name mangling... Why don't we just use real dirs, anyway. I'm sure ldlite, ldraw, and ledit support it. What programs do not. (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: a question about modeling the 9v battery box...
|
|
Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote in message news:37723A43.C63B60...ail.com... (...) That would be the ideal, but it would probably get in without that stuff, since the battery box is basically never used such that the insides show. It (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, we've been asking him to do this for the past couple months, and he has yet to listen. Along with proofreading, we've asked him to keep the message body text from the previous message. *Sigh* Jeff (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | a question about modeling the 9v battery box...
|
|
i have a friend who has a small collection of lego. that is where i origonally got the reference piece for the mast base and 1 x 2 x 1 black grill pannel from, amongst other pieces... this person has the 9v battery box (small). if i were to borrow (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FDu12p.3I1@lugnet.com... (...) meant (...) proof (...) Nice piece of deductive reasoning, Sherlok. -John Van (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines)
|
|
(...) Both of the above are common output from LDAO code. (...) Well, I was just throwing stuff out. I don't know if LDraw would take that one, or not. (...) Darned context-sensitive constructions. (...) I didn't say they made sense. Just that they (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) But if it was moved, the script could be refined so that things could be modified or removed as necessary, instead of just adding more info. Jeff (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) with #7 (...) stones (...) Whew... this was difficult to read until I deduced that "3!6 with 38" was meant to read "#16 with #8" (I think). Any chance you can take a little time to proof read your messages ? It would help us to help you. Chris (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) Hey Steve! That is *exactly* what I was thinking! (and I can't think of anytime when you said it, so if you did, I must've missed it.) That would be the way I'd like it done. I think it would make a cleaner directory tree. Jeff P.S. I hope you (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: SW laser cannon name
|
|
(...) We'd better call them "Podracer Energy Binders", then. Why? of the 32 total times this piece is used, half (16) are used as Energy Binders. One fourth of the time they are cannons, one eighth of the time they are used as stabilizers, one (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) I get your point, but something as necessary as the parts tracker should at least contain visible links to ldraw.org, if not be hosted there. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
good ieda. we simply put 4444p??.dat in 3!6 with 38 pattern and also in #16 with #7 pattern. as for names something like castle wall x by x by x with scattered stones pattern in light grey??? (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines)
|
|
(...) Nope, won't take a fraction w/o the integer part; gotta fix that (...) Nope, same reason as above (...) Nope, won't take a fraction w/o the fraction part, gotta fix that (...) Nope, same reason as above (...) Yep! Woo-Hoo!!! :-, (...) Nope, I (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
|