|
|
 | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: Lossless outlining (Was: [ldraw.org] Progress)
|
| (...) Sounds like a good feature to have around as well. What is the format difference between inlining and mpd anyways? They both contain multiple ldraw models in one file... (sorry I sound a little clueless...but all I use LDraw/LDAO for is making (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| (...) Actually, Steve, it isn't one way if you don't mind doing a little cutting and pasting :) So if you really think MPD is that much better than what you did, where can I get it to see if I like it, I mean there must be some sort of program to (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| (...) Sounds good to me. If you could, Steve, include an mpd compiler and splitter in the next version of LDAO that could make things easier for users. Oh, and what is happening with the rumored but illusive LDraw II project?? -Tim Courtney (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Lossless outlining (Was: [ldraw.org] Progress)
|
| (...) Is there any way to reverse the inlining to the original file (lossless outlining, I guess it would be) using the comment that the inlining function writes? Does the matrix math work in this direction? Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| (...) I'd recommend going with MPD. LDLite will render a (properly formatted) MPD file, and the MPD format allows downloaders the possibility of splitting the file back into its separate pieces. Inline is a one-way operation. Steve (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: desperatly seeking mock-up of the 4.5v points
|
| Two extremely mocked-up points parts could be found as sw-l.dat and sw-r.dat at: (URL) they are very roughly mocked-up, their orientation is exact. This is how I want them aligned. /Tore (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| I assume you use LDAO?? what you do is have a model that you're working on(normally one you've finished) and the submodels in the models folder(not neccessary though). You have the main file of the model highlighted, you go to tools, you scroll down (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| (...) Then I would like to ask someone to explain to me inlining.. you only inline the lines of the submodel...how do you get them all in one file, etc? -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: fixes??
|
| (...) Oh, right. Yes, cheating the lines in the renderer is acceptable. It doesn't help Mookie, but it would be a long-term solution. Steve (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| (...) Inline PLEASE!!! I know hothing about MPD except you have to split the file. Inline, you just go to the LDAO tools menu, click Inline, check the lines you wnat inlined, clik OK(or something to that efect), and your home free. Pretty easy if (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Voting page 9905
|
| (...) :-S Oops. I can be more specific (but it's really a minor issue): I am viewing it in LEdit at 2x magnification, at the underside. Underneath, you see the center cylinder, with four sets of two half-cylinders forming a cross around it. The (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| (...) This raises an important question. We should have a standard format for submodels for the TLG models. MPD or inlining? Given my limited knowledge, which is more user-friendly? can LDraw/LEdit/LDLite read an inlined file without the user having (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Voting page 9905
|
| (...) The placement of this part was discussed here before submitting it. It is probably not at all clear how it should be centered, but this was chosen as a compromise. The current placement should make it easy to use in a piston engine, which (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| (...) pages (...) html (...) assembling (...) created (...) to (...) progress. (...) like (...) I have gone through all of the models that have been sent, and then sent them on to Jeff so we would be comparing the same thing as I had inlined and (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Voting page 9905
|
| (...) Hmm. Why not, indeed? (...) I'm not seeing these. Of course, it took me about 5 minutes to figure out how you were viewing this piece in LEdit, since the part-file has almost 1500 lines. Steve (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: fixes??
|
| (...) You don't need to change anything in the LDraw language, you can use something called "Polygon Offset" (those who have used OpenGL will know what I mean), it moves the lines a little bit to the front when checking the Z-buffer. You'd just need (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| I haven't posted in a while concerning ldraw.org. So far, a handful of pages have been created, along with a few templates. I will end up doing the html myself for the site, but VOLUNTEERS ARE STILL NEEDED to work with assembling content. We still (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Voting page 9905 (JOSHUA D. Read this)
|
| (...) Made my day. :-> (...) Oh, the pain. (...) Thanks for the archeology, Joshua. So: Rectangle = 2853a T-shape = 2853b circle = 2853c -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
