 | | Re: Voting page 9905 (JOSHUA D. Read this)
|
|
(...) Fredrik Glöckner wrote: (...) Gar, guh, gah, guh.... D'oh! Did I _mention_ that conjecture wasn't allowed? I KNEW this'd happen... <sigh> <bg> ----- 1990: ---- 8850: I bought mine used [and was ripped off by the buyer on this one, thank you (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page 9905 (JOSHUA D. Read this)
|
|
(...) But you can't actually see the hole in that picture. The hole is not opposite the axle end, it is offset. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | desperatly seeking mock-up of the 4.5v points
|
|
if someone will gove me a mock-up of the 4.5v points then i will start on my program to layout train layouts in ldraw. it is the only train related part that i am missing (that i desperatly need). (25 years ago, 31-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: Voting page 9905 - Identical vertices
|
|
Thanks Lars, I fixed the problem and resent the part to Terry. Ampi ---...--- Imre Papp Geometria GIS Systems House email: ipapp@geometria.hu ---...--- (...) (25 years ago, 31-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page 9905 (JOSHUA D. Read this)
|
|
(...) I'm not sure if I agree with that. Looking at the 8251, a 1999 set, it looks like it has a rectangular slot: (URL) then again, I haven't got the 8251, so it may very well be that the parts included have the circular hole. I dunno. Fredrik (25 years ago, 31-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page 9905 (JOSHUA D. Read this)
|
|
(...) I don't have _any_ of these older sets. :-/ But, in checking the samples of 2853 I have (20+ free/not in models), all but one have the rectangular slot. I *might* have surmised from that that the rectangular slot variant is likely the newer (...) (25 years ago, 31-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page 9905 (JOSHUA D. Read this)
|
|
(...) My TECHNIC is currently packed away and inaccessible. I'll need the group's help for this. Here are the first couple years' use of this element. If you (anyone, anyone?) have one of these sets, and you're reasonably sure it's safely been kept (...) (25 years ago, 31-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page 9905 (JOSHUA D. Read this)
|
|
(...) There are two types? That means both most likely use the same number. Which means that at some point, someone will make the other version. Which means that the current version should have an alpha designator appended *now* so we don't have to (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: fixes??
|
|
(...) Ok, I checked this a little better now, it's only in LDLite that I'm missing lines on the studs.. Ldraw a little, though the part that's missing in ldraw is opposite, so I'm guessing it's more the renderer like you mentioned. is there (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: fixes??
|
|
(...) No, I don't get the full circle at any resolution, there is always the missing section from about 7:00 to 11:00. I'm viewing these in ldlite, though I believe I've seen this before in ldraw and ledit.. I'll take another look though just to be (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: what happened to the train wheel rubber ring
|
|
(...) well jon i WILL be making it. LOL im buisy making 30407 now (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: fixes??
|
|
(...) I'm not sure this is a problem with the primitives themselves - more an issue with the renderer? When you view from above at high magnification, do you get the complete circle? If so, this should prove that all the lines are defined in the (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page 9905
|
|
(...) Yes, there are two variants of this piece, one with a rectangular slot, and one with a circular. To me, the circular one seems to be more frequent, but it may just be here in Europe. I dunno. Fredrik (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: stud.dat vs STUD.DAT
|
|
(...) Maybe. The stud-as-line drawing, and the location of the stud, are pretty obvious already. So it is not critically needed. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | stud.dat vs STUD.DAT
|
|
i think that the stud.dat reference in the technic pin 1/2 should be capatilised (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | what happened to the train wheel rubber ring
|
|
i remember seeing something about the train wheel rubber ring being made... who made it and where can i get it? (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | part renaming ideas
|
|
here are some part re-naming ideas castle dragon flame to minifig fire castle goblet to minifig goblet castle lance to minifig lance castle magic wand to minifig magic wand castle pike to minifig pike castle shield to minifig shield castle sword to (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part question: 30358
|
|
(...) Yes, it is necessary. (...) First off, I would not use the primitives for this intersection. Once the highest Y value of the intersecting curve is known, I would scale the stud2a.dat primitive to reach that point. To find the points for the (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | fixes??
|
|
Is it possible for someone to fix the stud.dat primitives so there aren't holes in the tops of the studs in the detail lines? Or is this only the way every brick and plate draws on my system? it seems there is always a hole in the detail line upper (...) (25 years ago, 29-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page 9905
|
|
Comments on the voting 6222: Some optional lines on the cylinders on the underside appear to be missing. This is apparent when viewed from the underside. 2853: My version of this has just a rectangular slot where the axlehole breaks through the (...) (25 years ago, 29-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
