Subject:
|
Re: stud.dat vs STUD.DAT
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 30 May 1999 06:22:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
572 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sun, 30 May 1999 05:04:50 GMT, "jonathan wilson" <wilsonj@xoommail.com>
wrote:
> i think that the stud.dat reference in the technic pin 1/2 should be
> capatilised
Maybe. The stud-as-line drawing, and the location of the stud, are pretty
obvious already. So it is not critically needed.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
2 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
