To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 1686
1685  |  1687
Subject: 
Torso number was Forestman Torso was Voting Page
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Thu, 13 May 1999 08:12:13 GMT
Viewed: 
626 times
  
On Tue, 11 May 1999 16:43:48 GMT, "Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote:

We have plenty of 9326p... numbers left, and using this suggested approach for
the dungarees torso seems to have created confusion, so I would prefer to make
another decorated part for the black collar version (probably p50). And perhaps
go back and re-work the dungarees?

Chris

Chris, you seem to by the "torso guy" around here, so if you have a good plan
for those pieces, then go for it.

And on another note, it has come to my attention that 9326 is NOT the torso
number.  I really hate to say this, but we need to move the torsos out of that
number to a 3-digit number.

The good news is that we don't know for sure what 9326 is exactly, so we can
have "~moved to" files for all of them.  At least until 9326 becomes known and
made - which may be quite a long time.
But we do need to move them, as 9326 is known to be wrong.  9xxx series numbers
were basically a precursor to the current 8xxxx series numbers.  Numbers which
refer to a composite structure, not a single piece.  In this case, torsos
*with* arms - not just armless torsos.

So you can see the future conflict, and why we should do it now, as the problem
only gets worse as time goes by.

And since the torsos are already going through a mass structural change, it
would be good idea to do it now.

Any preferences to which 3-digit number to use?  932 is open.  Or 999. Heck, a
pretty wide open field, in fact.

-- Terry K --



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Torso number was Forestman Torso was Voting Page
 
(...) So waittaminut. I read you writing that 9326 *was* a number for the composite torso-with-arms-and-hands, but is not any longer used for that purpose. The 9xxx numbers were an earlier composite range. New parts are made with 5-digit numbers. So (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Forestman Torso was Voting Page
 
(...) Yes - in fact the red (maroon actually, not TLG red) and blue versions are in the latest voting download as 9326p48 and p49 (but not on the voting page - see Terry's apology at (URL) have plenty of 9326p... numbers left, and using this (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

15 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR