 | | Re: Status of ldglite 0.9.5 source on Mac ?
|
|
(...) I have a pretty good idea where those problems might be. If you want, I could try and help you over the trouble spots one at a time like I did with James on OS X. Don (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Case of part filenames?
|
|
What's the story with upper vs. lower case in part filenames? In my brief survey of my parts directory, it looks like all the files use all upper case where they use letters (".DAT" and the "P" for patterned elements). Additionally, many parts (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Status of ldglite 0.9.5 source on Mac ?
|
|
I don't think anyone has tried. James (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Status of ldglite 0.9.5 source on Mac ?
|
|
I have been attempting to compile the 0.9.5 source with CW-5 and have a variety of problems. Has anyone successfully compiled this for MacOS (8.x or 9.x) ? Ray (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | progress report (was "Re: Looking for DAT of Wedge Curved 2x6x1")
|
|
(...) I've posted an almost-comlete version of 41765: "(URL) only things remaining for this one is encoding the sliced tubes (i.e., where the top-studs meet the sidewalls). Thanks, Franklin (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 6588 Question
|
|
(...) Heh, yeah. You're absolutely right. OK, I give up: what was the 7 for? Steve (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: glut conundrum
|
|
(...) That would be me. Anywhere you see "NOTE" its probably a note to myself that I want to get back to something and do it right when I have more time. I don't always get around to revisiting things though, especially if the cheap fix works well (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: glut conundrum
|
|
(...) Indeed, it is a very old bug, and it appears that someone ran into this more recently based on the following comment in the 0.9.5 code ... // NOTE: I dont understand the colortable stack used in translate_color() // so use the default (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: glut conundrum
|
|
(...) Thats an affirmative, however, I have two development limitations: CW-5 and MacOS 8.6, which I do not believe has been attempted with the latest source code, so this may involve a bit of effort. Ray (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: glut conundrum
|
|
(...) That may be a very old bug. I remember there was a problem with the background color way back when. You can check the logs or browse the current (and old) source at the sourceforge to compare. (URL) the 0.5 code may actually predate the CVS (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: glut conundrum
|
|
(...) Disregard please, I figured it out. I can now compile macLDGLite 0.5 with the OpenGL 1.2 SDK using CW-5. I also figured out how to supress the annoying SIOUX window, so I have a non-debug version that displays cleanly. Now to todays question.. (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | glut conundrum
|
|
If someone out there has the glut and glutdebug libraries which were modified and recompiled based on the OpenGL 1.2 SDK, could they please email them to me. I have the 1.2 SDK, but the projects are based on the later version of CW and I would (...) (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 6588 Question
|
|
(...) ????? By my calculation, 3 1/3 bricks = 10 plates ??????? ROSCO (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 6588 Question
|
|
(...) The height on this part name was given in plates. 3 1/3 bricks = 7 plates. And see (URL) for new developments. :) Steve (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | "www.ldraw.org" off-line
|
|
Hi, I made some kind of mistake, when I moved "www.ldraw.org" to a new power supply this morning, so the machine is off-line for a while. I hope to have everything back in order soon. Play well, Jacob (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
|
"Bernd Broich" <bernd.broich@online.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:GrF5JD.5zI@lugnet.com... (...) I found a free UML tool that works and made a class graph showing the classes, we talked about. The tool, Poseidon for UML, is java-based and (as (...) (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Part 6588 Question
|
|
There are many aspects of the art of piece nomenclature that continue to escape me, but this one has me completely stumped. I just came across what I think is ``Technic Gearbox 2 x 4 x 7'' (URL) doing an inventory of set 6775. I cannot for the life (...) (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | I'd like to have a little word with Duncan Jardine - Winner of the SOTM September 2001 on Ldraw.org
|
|
Hi Duncan, I'd like to ask you some question about your rendering. Unfortunately you haven't left any e-mail-address. Please contact me. Many thx. Willy (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Volunteer(s) please!
|
|
Hi all, I just finished chapter 3 to 7 of CONV101 and RNDR101. It covers all the camera options of L3P and explaining the globe, camera angle and very basic rendering (readers may only hit the “Run” button, he he). Could someone please proofread it (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Entries needed for LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM
|
|
hi all, I suspect that the flood of entries for the current competition has probably scared away entries for next month. Don't let that happen. Its Valentines Day and so far I only have one entry for each category. Not good. If you've been thinking (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
