 | | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
"Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:GnsJ68.Bzr@lugnet.com... <SNIP> (...) For me it's the kind of file - while mpd contains multiple models, ldr and dat contain only one file (I thought it's more logical ???). But I'm always (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Color question
|
|
Still on the 200101 update: I noticed that 3297P90 (slope with classic space pattern) had some polys with color 18. Isn't it an illegal color code or did I miss a discussion and now it's valid ? The FAQ doesn't say anything about being able to use (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
Tim Courtney wrote... (...) L3P accepts any extension. The only special feature is, that if your model is called MODEL.DAT or MODEL.MPD you can leave out the extension and just type "l3p MODEL". This will of course also apply to MODEL.LDR from the (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
"Rui Martins" <Rui.Martins@Link.pt> wrote in message news:3C0BB8B1.803010...Link.pt... (...) No, for now parts stay .DAT. (...) It isn't as big of a deal as you are making it out to be. I've had many discussions with Steve about this, and he (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
(...) This is Not exactly required! (...) Yes, but it will break compatibility, with older programs. (...) Don't really know. (...) So, the actual goal, of switching to an unambigous extension, doesn't really work, because, everybody, must keep (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
Hello, (...) its (...) LEdit can be changed. I did it myself. Just patch the extension with a hex-editor from .DAT to LDR. No reverse-engineering necessary ;)) Greetings Carsten (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Daily News
|
|
(...) Try searching for '2599*' or 'flipper*'. Partsref doesn't do partial-word matches by default. Steve (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
|
(...) Yuck. I'm not allocating anything really HUGE on the stack. Plus I can't think of a good way to check in C if a stack allocation fails. On the other hand, the offscreen image buffer IS huge, but that's allocated on the heap, and I do check to (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
|
(...) Hmmm... I tried in Bash, and suddenly it worked. Tried again in Tcsh, and it didn't work. Ran `limit stacksize unlimited` and tried again. Then it worked. Apparently you allocate some data on the stack without checking if the allocation (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
ahhhhh, ok that exlains it. thanks! Gary Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:GnrB9B.7yC@lugnet.com... (...) more (...) not (...) for (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:GnrB9B.7yC@lugnet.com... (...) more (...) I forgot to add, DAT will always be compatible, and should always be compatible. LEdit has .DAT hard-coded (and we have not found a copy of its source (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
Hi everybody - A few of you are curious about the new default file format the latest version of MLCad uses, .LDR. I will attempt to explain this to eliminate any confusion. For a while we (website organizers and core contributors) have wanted the (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
|
(...) That's bizarre, it works fine for me. See below. Humor me and delete the copy in /usr/local/bin and then try it again. Perhaps it's a screen size issue? Mesa has some rather small limits in it's config file and should be recompiled with larger (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
|
(...) ~/> ~dheyse/ldglite/ldglite -mS /usr/local/share/ldr...s/3001.dat Segmentation fault ~/> :-( I updated the instructions at: (URL) both "makefile.linux" and "main.c" are corrected according to your instructions. I tried that as well. The (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org 2001-02 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
[FUT lugnet.cad] The LDraw.org parts update 2001-02 is now available! This is the second parts update using the new Parts Tracker, and it seems to be working well. There are 62 files in this release, including some 41 new files. Get it at (URL). (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev) !
|
| |
| | ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Voting for December 2001
|
|
Just a reminder... Voting for the Model/Scene of the Month now commences promptly on the first of each month and runs through to the end of the month. So it is there and waiting now at: (URL) Terry K -- (23 years ago, 2-Dec-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | ldraw.org's MOTM & SOTM Winners for November 2001
|
|
Hi All, Time to announce the winners for November... MOTM: Joseph Gonzalez for his "Shinkitsune" mech. SOTM: Cale Leiphart for "A Garden Tour". Congratulations to both for a job well done. And see both the winners at: (URL) don't forget, with the (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | Re: Small bug in certified part 30187 Bike 3 Wheel Motorcycle Body Upper
|
|
(...) I'm sorry, but, I have reviewed the lines indicated, and the suggested fix will not be made. The parts align the way they are. Changing those two lines would make about 10 other lines need to be changed. No change being made. Paul (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) I would not agree to it, I get too much junk mail as it is. :) (...) I was think along this line as well. If the tracker keeps "track" of who submitted the part file, it could email the comments directly to the submitter. - or - A check box (...) (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) No big deal - no harm done, and it got recertified in time. I just thought it was funny - I didn't think anyone would do anything in the short time I was working. Steve (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
