Subject:
|
Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 14:48:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
748 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jacob Sparre Andersen writes:
> Hmmm... I tried in Bash, and suddenly it worked.
>
> Tried again in Tcsh, and it didn't work. Ran `limit
> stacksize unlimited` and tried again. Then it worked.
> Apparently you allocate some data on the stack without
> checking if the allocation succeeds or not.
Yuck. I'm not allocating anything really HUGE on the stack.
Plus I can't think of a good way to check in C if a stack
allocation fails.
On the other hand, the offscreen image buffer IS huge, but
that's allocated on the heap, and I do check to see if the
allocation is successful.
I guess I'll have to login sometime tonight and try to
debug it from tcsh to see what's going on.
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
| (...) It looks like the OSMesa driver doesn't like it when you call glutGet(GLUT_SCREEN_WIDTH). I would have thought that was a reasonable way to get the maximimum bitmap dimensions, but I guess the Mesa folks decided a new extension was needed (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
| (...) Hmmm... I tried in Bash, and suddenly it worked. Tried again in Tcsh, and it didn't work. Ran `limit stacksize unlimited` and tried again. Then it worked. Apparently you allocate some data on the stack without checking if the allocation (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
