To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / *6795 (-20)
  Re: 'Article from Tommorow' < Warning Speculative!!>
 
(...) Yeah, I still prefer using the original version of LDraw. MLCad uses too many of my system resources. I wish someone would update LDraw!!! Mike (24 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Diablo-style RPG?
 
Hey, Anyone interested in creating a Diablo-style RPG using LDraw? I sorta know how to do it using the freeware Dink Smallwood engine. It wouldn't be too hard, just time-consuming. Plus, to all you long-term, quasi-professional LDraw & Lugnet (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Anyone want to help with help?
 
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:29:05 -0700, Tim Courtney wrote (in message <G7qoxH.25s@lugnet.com>): (...) Uh, I don't know how reliable I'll be checking my mail, but as I usually get one or two questions a week anyway, I'd be willing to sign up. I'd rather (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Anyone want to help with help?
 
Hi - I'm looking for one or two people who think they have a good working knowledge of the DAT utilities and how they work together to run the sort-of LDraw.org 'help desk.' This would entail answering email at help@ldraw.org (currently points to (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: MOTM voting for February
 
"koen" <koen.jordens@studen...ven.ac.be> wrote in message news:G7qFMC.LoA@lugnet.com... (...) Sounds like a good idea, as long as that is a separate contest. Anyone else interested? -Tim (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: MOTM voting for February
 
Perhaps in the future could could we also have a contest where the actual .dat or .mpd file is available for viewing? I don't think the robotarm stands a very good chance of winning because it's not the best rendering but perhaps a technical (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: MOTM voting for February
 
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:a0p07ts361v0md6...4ax.com... (...) Yeah...I thought of that. Different people see it different ways - I started MOTM to showcase a good 3D rendering on the front page, to display potential (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: MOTM voting for February
 
(...) That's a nice quote to point out the different POV's between the people running a contest and the people entering the contest. Steve (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: MOTM voting for February
 
"Brad Hamilton" <bhamilto1@home.com> wrote in message news:G7pAup.B5u@lugnet.com... (...) Same here! I just have to quit gawking and think 'what will look the best on the front page?' because that's the point of the contest :) -Tim (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: MOTM voting for February
 
There is an excellent selection this month! It took me about 10 minutes to decide on my vote. Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:G7orCs.7oH@lugnet.com... (...) news:G7oMqH.GtD@lugnet.com... (...) I've (...) for my (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: MOTM voting for February
 
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G7oMqH.GtD@lugnet.com... (...) DUUDE...this is going to be tough! These are some of the best renderings I've seen up period (and I'm not referring to my entry). I doubt I could vote for my own (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  MOTM voting for February
 
Salutations virtual brickheads, Voting for the ldraw.org MOTM is now up and running; (URL) intriguing variety this time 'round. -- Terry K -- (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)  
 
  Re: 'Article from Tommorow' < Warning Speculative!!>
 
<Warning this article is a speculative post designed to encourage disscusssion on new ideas (and hopefully suggest some Ideas to TLC/TLG.) > Hold the presses!! Some new info just come through on the WAP service from Lego.com... (...) And thats the (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDraw.org Reference Organization Questions
 
(...) For right now, keep the layout basically how it is. I'd add posting dates for each of the items, and put the newest items at the top. If an item gets significantly updated, move it to the top. You might also add icons (either textual or (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LCAD 02?- Comments wanted
 
"Farlie A" <alex_farlie@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G7BByH.9I8@lugnet.com... (...) suggested. (...) I believe that though you have some good suggestions, the time and energy required to develop a new format is almost a waste of time given the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  LCAD 02?- Comments wanted
 
Hello, A couple of days ago I posted some ideas for additonas to the LCAD standrd to lugent.cad under the subject LCAD02... I wondering if anyone here had comments on the proposals... I felt that it was better to devlop a standard by conensus rather (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: New "calculator" for parts authors. ( for windows 95+, nt?)
 
Hi Paul, Now the zip is OK. At the first glance it seems to be very useful. I guess I will have more seriuos comments when I will use it to solve a real calculation problem during a part creation. Only one thing that I have to mention. In the rare (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDraw.org Reference Organization Questions
 
Ryan Farrington <ryanjf@ifriendly.com> wrote in message news:004801c07f19$ad...dly.com... (...) Ryan - Thanks for the help. I just plugged that into Dreamweaver to preview it and I like what I see. A couple things which I'll have to work out later: (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
 
  Could someone make this part?
 
Could someone please make the part that is used in Hydronaut sets that connected the hoses to the suction cups? I don't have any Hydronaut sets, but a friend of mine who does found that this piece makes a GREAT space gun/blaster. So if any part (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: !!Warning- Pure Speculation!!
 
(...) Maybe , but I thought Pov ray did that!! But i'll consider adding radiosity and light sources to the LCAD02 Standard I am thinking about writing.. (...) Yes.. Exactly... The whole purpose of the a 'speculative post is to encourage friendly (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.cad.dev)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR