 | | Re: Whither L3P?
|
|
Thanks, Hoss. Don't know why I can't see his server. James (...) I (...) using (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whither L3P?
|
|
(...) hey jim-bob! i got in no problem, just mailed you a copy of the zip file to the above address... :) J (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Whither L3P?
|
|
Trying to rebuild my Lego software. Again. Gotta love Windows 9x. Anyway, I can't get L3P -- my browser can't locate the server. Here's the URL I'm using -- is there another? (URL) Wilson (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
(...) I think there would be some interest in have virtual clone parts available in LDraw format. (...) Where can he post them? Would lugnet.cad.dat be acceptable? Maybe lugnet.cad.dat.ideas? Or would it be better if Dave (and anyone else with clone (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New part: Plate 6 x 6 x 2/3 Cross with Dome - 30303.dat
|
|
(...) motivation and time to model it, then please go ahead and enjoy the challenge. I think we will end up with more parts if authors work on those which interest them and are within their authoring capabilities, rather than feeling an obligation (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Backing up other people's web sites? (Was: Problems with Ldraw related sites)
|
|
[ XFUT lugnet.publish ] Manfred Moolhuysen: [...] (...) [...] This reminds me of the problems I run into now and then, when websites I link to disappear (not saying that the LDraw Parts Tracker is disappearing). Should I offer people to keep a (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Ldraw related sites
|
|
(...) Yes, that did the trick, it's working again But the the LDraw Parts Tracker is not working still. Last week I've send a message to Zachary Benz his personal address about this. I haven't recieved a reply from him jet. Is his status known to (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
(...) That's all I needed to know! In that case I certainly won't post them here, but if anyone wants them, let me know via Email. (...) Oops! Looks like I'm going to have to re-browse the charter. Sorry! Dave! (still getting the hang of things!) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
(...) Not to put a damper on your enthusiasm for clone parts, but please don't post any clone parts here even if you *do* get a generally positive consensus. Note that the charter for lugnet.cad.dat.parts only allows for official LEGO® elements: (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone have a good name for TLC part#30303?
|
|
(...) -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 21-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone have a good name for TLC part#30303?
|
|
Jonathan Wilson wrote in message: (...) fighter (...) As long as you have wanted that part, I figured *you* would have made it by now. ---D M Garcia (URL) (25 years ago, 21-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
|
|
Hello! Eventually I finished orienting (automatically) all faces of bricks 10 and 2560! For those who are interested by the results, please have a look at (URL) the same place, one'll find the corrected 2560. Yes, this part as small bugs: 16 faces (...) (25 years ago, 21-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone have a good name for TLC part#30303?
|
|
(...) Hmm... This is a piece that belongs in the Space category, if anything does. But I'll deny saying that, later. ;) It's not a Brick. It doesn't belong in Equipment. It's not really a Wing. The only category it really fits into is Plate. How (...) (25 years ago, 20-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Is the LDraw parts database free?
|
|
(...) I'll agree with you. There is definitively a creative process going on when modeling brick, possibly except for the very simplest ones. (...) Yes, but these differences reflect the format, not the author, don't they? Fredrik (25 years ago, 20-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone have a good name for TLC part#30303?
|
|
(...) That would be ok, except... I don't have one... yet. Paul (25 years ago, 20-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone have a good name for TLC part#30303?
|
|
What is next now that you have done this part? If you have one the tie fighter etc canopy piece would be appreciated. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone have a good name for TLC part#30303?
|
|
(...) Keywords should have: rock raiders rockraiders underground starwars star wars sith infiltrator -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Anyone have a good name for TLC part#30303?
|
|
I have this part very near completion and would like to know what to call it. Also what category and keywords to use. The 30303 is the 6 x 6 "4 point", "plate?" that is used as the #4910 Hover Scout base (URL) and the landing pads for the 4980 (...) (25 years ago, 20-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) There are two possibilities for updating the document with this approach: 1. Just change the syntax expressions, and modify any syntax-specific references. This would be the low-impact approach, with only cosmetic changes. 2. Rework the (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Is the LDraw parts database free?
|
|
* Jacob Sparre Andersen (sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk) [991119 10:29]: (...) Even worse; Giving a part to the part-library gives up certain rights to the part. If it isn't clear what rights exist, then people may not make parts for the part-library. I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
