 | | Re: POV-RAY light-green color
|
|
(...) You're right, trying to use the same RGB for solid and transparent colors doesn't really work. It *is* handy for the user to be able to convert between solid and trans by adding or subtracting 32. Steve -- I don't know why I'm posting this, it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: POV-RAY light-green color
|
|
(...) I don't recall exactly why Color10 got that RGB value, but probably because it gave the best Color42 (Transparent green-yellow) Currently L3P uses the same RGB values for 0-15 and 32-47. I think I should give up this. I remember that it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | POV-RAY light-green color
|
|
L3P declares Color10 (Light-Green) this way: #declare Color10 = #if (version >= 3.1) material { #end texture { pigment { rgb <0.862745,1,0.0392157> } finish { ambient AMB diffuse DIF } The result is some neon yellow kinda colour. LDraw FAQ defines (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: Voting page for 9906
|
|
C:\> mkdir a9906 C:\> cd a9906\s C:\a9906> pkunzip a:9906part C:\a9906> mkdir s C:\a9906> cd s C:\a9906\s> pkunzip a:9906sub C:\a9906\s> cd .. C:\a9906> cd .. C:\> l3p -check a9906 >c9906.txt 19 files in a9906\S checked. 67 files in a9906 checked. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) I agree that Anton's settings are the best: (URL) makes me wanna reach out my hand and grab the model. I think he uses just one light (area-light) and maybe also radiosity. (...) Yes, like John VanZwieten suggested: (URL) The slope bricks (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) Heh. Well I think Bram might've been suggesting was more like this: --Jonathan When he said, "the same way you would sign a letter," he meant a written letter, not signing with letters. (I think. :-) --Todd (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) Aaah. now I see Like this: JW (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) That shouldn't keep you from signing your messages. When posting from the web interface, I sign by adding "--Bram" to the end. If I'm emailing, I use a complete signature. There's nothing stopping you from typing your name at then end of a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) You might be able to, after all. According to your NNTP headers, You appear to be using Netscape 4.03 for Win95: X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (Win95; I) I'm not too familiar with that version, but I know that 4.5 has sig-file capability: In the (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) Because of the way I access the internet I am unable to use a signature. (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: POV-RAY orange color
|
|
(...) Try 44 (IIRC) or maybe 48. -Tom McD. when replying, the walls of Jericho crumbled like spamcake. (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: POV-RAY orange color
|
|
I use 462 as orange and it comes out in POV for me. Scott R Dennett wrote in message <199908181802010100....te.net>... (...) <snip> Ryan (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | POV-RAY orange color
|
|
OK, what color number do I use to get orange in POV-RAY?? Color 25 doesn't work for either the orange or that wierd blue. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Ryan "I have confidence in the Lord. He'll put me in whatever situation He wants me in, (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) I'm not sure which library has the most realistic finishes and colors, but you may want to compare the output of Anton's, Lutz's, Paul's, and your own definitions for LEGO colors and finishes. I think Anton's lego_finish and pure colors (ie (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) I like this idea as well. But I think we should wait on the results of the vote first - because he has gone over the edge with his antics (as far as I'm concerned) and I'd like to see a break where I don't have to worry about his posts at all. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) I like this idea, but I think a self-regulated restriction would be better than a system-imposed limit, for several reasons: 1. Todd doesn't have to develop the solution. 2. It's a simple, measurable way for Jonathan to show (in)compliance. 3. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | RE: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) You should try the beta v1.2 Win32 L3P32: (URL) have successfully used it for a 6000 part model. Be sure to try out the new STUDS flag in the POV-file to reduce rendering time during the test renderings. and Bram Lambrecht wrote in another (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) Well, I'm pretty sure you didn't, as I was anxious and alert about your reactions to L3P. An "invitation" in the very first L3P announcement of August 27th 1998: (...) and some later on was apparently ignored? But never mind that now. I will (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) He's said he would change before, in other ways, and hasn't. He apologized for his rudeness and said he wouldn't do it anymore a few days ago, then spent the last two days trying to defend a rude message he sent to Tore by arguing that since (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) How about we give Todd a break? Kick him (JW) out or don't - don't ask Todd to spend his very valuable time hacking into his code to come up with something like this. I'm sure Todd COULD do it, but boy, the things he could be doing instead - (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
