 | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
|
(...) I will do the following as of right now. 1. Stop asking for parts, help with parts, models, help with models and related questions (e.g. is this part in ldraw questions). 2. Start using capital letters and checking the spelling of messages 3. (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: why is the roadsign round with no throughoufare sign called 7284?
|
|
(...) Um... Yes? If a part has a four-digit number like that, then that *should* be the correct TLG number. You should know that by now. Same thing for 3xxxx, 7xxxx, 8xxxx numbers. 3-digit numbers, and ones with "P" or "C" or alpha-suffixes, are the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
|
(...) I will use captial letters in future, OK. I did not know it pissed people off so much. Also i do not have the skills to do the rounded edges on the baseplate part and the other baseplates do not have the edges so I will assume that they are (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
|
(...) Tamy, I agree, and I think this is becoming a serious problem. In fact, I just learned from Joshua Delahunty tonight via a private email that he has stopped reading this group because of Jonathan. This is a quote -- with permission: JD> [...] (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
|
(...) do i have to do the rounded edges to get the part in? if not then ---...--- This is the stuff we are talking about.. the above sentence.. you are already looking for the easy way to do the part.. that's NOT how these are done.. the parts are (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | i admit i was wrong
|
|
i admit i was wrong in trying to do so many parts so fast. i will take the groups suggestion that i work ion one part untill it is really ready then start on the next one. the first part i will do is the baseplate 32 x 32 raised with ramp. then i (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 30373 - tie fighter wing piece
|
|
(...) That's too bad. If I knew anything at all about how to make parts, I'd consider taking it up, but I suspect the results won't be worth the effort. Maybe I'll just use the mockup in my set. Unless some kind soul out there is willing to take up (...) (25 years ago, 12-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 30373 - tie fighter wing piece
|
|
(...) I posted the mockup without intention of finalizing the piece. That's why I didn't register anything on the Parts Tracker. However, if someone else wants to finish the part, the mockup file may be a good starting point. If I remember (...) (25 years ago, 12-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 30373 - tie fighter wing piece
|
|
I've a question about 30373, the big square-ish 6x6x2 block with the cutouts used on the wings for the TIE fighter and Sith Infiltrator. I saw that many moons ago (April) Steve Bliss had cobbled together a .dat mockup for this part. Has it been (...) (25 years ago, 12-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can someone please ldraw me the jail cell door?
|
|
(...) Is he? (...) Because it encourages more recklessness and carelessness and bad attitude from him? --Todd (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) Probably best if you just forget it then. --Todd (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Finally Saw It!
|
|
(...) Thanks! :) (...) That was the intention, and the intention is to optimize the site for future additions of content. Glad you like! -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Rubber chickens are the best applied use of polystyrene to date. Get (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org Not Found
|
|
Adam, Thanks for the tips. Jacob has pinpointed the problem: (...) So a solution is being worked on. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org Not Found
|
|
Hi Tim, I tried something new today. (After seeing ldraw.org on my mom's comp at school I gained renewed interest in solving this problem.) I tried typing in the IP address to see if it would come up. It didn't. I also tried looking for several (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Finally Saw It!
|
|
Hi LDraw.org Team, I finally saw the site. (I had to use my mom's connection at school- Mindspring still won't let me through :( I thought it was excellent! You have done a great job putting it together. I liked all the links being in one place. And (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org Banner Ad
|
|
Very nice banner, Tim. Ryan "A lot of kids nowadays don't care if they die. They don't care where they're going after they die. But when you have Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, you know you have better things coming after you die." Russell (...) (25 years ago, 8-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | ldraw.org Banner Ad
|
|
I finally got off my butt and whipped up an ldraw.org banner ad. This ad is at the standard full size of 468x60 - a 400x40 (CLSOTW/LinkExchange) version is coming soon). Please send comments on the banner and feel free to place it on your site (...) (25 years ago, 8-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDlite 1.6 problems
|
|
(...) Similar to how I added it to rayshade (for examples, see the instruction sheets at the bottom of: (URL) (...) Easy: have the internal bitmap be twice as wide and high, and shrink it down to display on the screen, blending the pixels together. (...) (25 years ago, 7-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Need Linux testers
|
|
Hi, I'm working on a Linux Lego CAD program and would like to hear some suggestions from you, for those interested in taking a look go to (URL) and tell me what you think. It's not finished yet but you can load LeoCAD and LDraw files and use the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New primitive: Pneumatic nozzle?
|
|
(...) Ah, yes, that's probably a better idea. Thanks for the input. Fredrik (25 years ago, 6-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
