| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Mookie <Mookie1@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> > i admit i was wrong in trying to do so many parts so fast.
> > i will take the groups suggestion that i work ion one part untill it is
> > really ready then start on the next one. the first part i will do is the
> > baseplate 32 x 32 raised with ramp.
> > then i will do the frame for the jail cell door folowed by the archery
> > target. i have fixed all the problems with the baseplate that i can
> > find.
> > [...]
>
> [...]
> Also don't bother with the Archery Target, we've already seen your last
> attempt at it.. and I've already asked Tom Burger to do it and he's
> agreed..
> I'd rather have someone that takes pride in their parts do them then
> someone who's looking for the easy way out...
> [...]
> People have asked you 1000 times to use proper typing skills... This is
> the last time I'll hear it, because if your next message comes out the
> same as the rest, I will killfile your posts so I don't have to
> subjected to them.. and I'm sure others have already done this... Maybe
> after you're talking to yourself for a while you'll get the idea....
> (bangs head on the wall, it will probably do just as much good...)
Tamy, I agree, and I think this is becoming a serious problem. In fact, I
just learned from Joshua Delahunty tonight via a private email that he has
stopped reading this group because of Jonathan. This is a quote -- with
permission:
JD> [...]
JD> It got really terrifically boring reading the same ol'
JD> shtuff over and over again, anyway. I'd say that Jonathan
JD> Wilson was the last straw for me. He pretty much completely
JD> disinterested me in participating in the .cad.dev group, and
JD> that was my mainstay for a long time. Now I just act as
JD> consultant when Terry finishes an update.
JD> [...]
JD> He just reminds me of all the petty gimme-gimme, metoo-metoo
JD> types out there in the world that the Internet (and RTL at times)
JD> has attracted; people who expect it all, all for free, all right now.
JD> [...]
This really upset me when I read it.
Has anyone else left the group because of Jonathan Wilson's behavior?
Has anyone considered it?
--Todd
|
|
Message has 5 Replies:
 | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) I will do the following as of right now. 1. Stop asking for parts, help with parts, models, help with models and related questions (e.g. is this part in ldraw questions). 2. Start using capital letters and checking the spelling of messages 3. (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| <Snip> (...) now. (...) Yes, his messages somehow boring and generally no point to go. BUT, he doesn't use any profanity, and made nothing against the black book. He even tries to contribute some and recently climbs some necessary steps, too, which (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) I did, months ago. That's one of the reasons my mirror of the L-CAD updates are usually a few days behind the main site - I don't find out about them (or anything else having to do with LDraw) until Terry e-mails me. (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) Mike, I sympathize with you. Jonathan really t's me off too. Its sad that his rude arrogance caused you to leave. -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Rubber chickens are the best applied use of polystyrene to date. Get paid to surf the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) And use a signature??? That pisses people off too. How about ignoring peoples' constructive posts about your behavior, like this one: (URL) received no response or apparent change on your part (and took up a good 45 minutes of my busy life to (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) do i have to do the rounded edges to get the part in? if not then ---...--- This is the stuff we are talking about.. the above sentence.. you are already looking for the easy way to do the part.. that's NOT how these are done.. the parts are (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
146 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
