 | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
|
(...) I migth have a go at this piece, it has number 30360 embossed in it. But I'm not starting right now. And although I'm aware that most of you are desparately in need for this part, I strongly believe that this part needs some of the new (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | How do you know the numbers?
|
|
I'm a bit puzzled. How do you guys know that the Technic Axle #5 has number 32073 (off my memory) and that the Technic Connector with Axlehole has number 32039? As far as I can see, these numbers are not printed on the parts. Do you have a spy (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Voting page 9905
|
|
Padewans, Voting for update 9905 commences: (URL) that 4 unapproved primitives are include for the cone 3x3x2 piece. (The 3x3x2 cone! Finally! I've been doing that Jedi mind-control hand movement in Steve's direction for *months* - guess it finally (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed primitive for notched round surface
|
|
Sorry Taskforce, I've made a crucial typing error in my answer to a mail from Lars yesterday. In the second part of the answer to his question: (...) "I believe that in this case a 1-4cyli primitive rotated over 45 degrees covers the inner wall (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9904 released
|
|
(...) The "best" orientation for many parts is debatable, and usually easy enough to change when modelling. Especially on baseplates. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Yes, the consensus. That is the tough part. I do think that, whichever way we decide to go, that the cross-section should have a little more roundness to it. The output in POV-Ray is proof of that. OK people, how about this: Manfreds (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 1-4ring3 [DAT]
|
|
0 1-4ring3.dat 0 Name: 1-4ring3.dat 0 Author: Karim Nassar 0 Un-Official Primitive 4 16 3 0 0 2.772 0 1.148 3.696 0 1.531 4 0 0 4 16 2.772 0 1.148 2.121 0 2.121 2.828 0 2.828 3.696 0 1.531 4 16 2.121 0 2.121 1.148 0 2.772 1.531 0 3.696 2.828 0 2.828 (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 1-4rin10 [DAT]
|
|
0 1-4rin10.dat 0 Name: 1-4rin10.dat 0 Author: Karim Nassar 0 Un-Official 4 16 10 0 0 9.239 0 3.827 10.163 0 4.21 11 0 0 4 16 9.239 0 3.827 7.071 0 7.071 7.778 0 7.778 10.163 0 4.21 4 16 7.071 0 7.071 3.827 0 9.239 4.21 0 10.163 7.778 0 7.778 4 16 (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 1-4cone1.dat [DAT]
|
|
0 1-4cone1.dat 0 Name: 1-4cone1.dat 0 Author: Karim Nassar 0 Un-Official 5 16 0 1 1 0 0 2 -0.765 0 1.848 0.765 0 1.848 5 16 0.383 1 0.924 0.765 0 1.848 0 0 2 1.414 0 1.414 5 16 0.707 1 0.707 1.414 0 1.414 0.765 0 1.848 1.848 0 0.765 5 16 0.924 1 (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to Primitives Committee:
|
|
(...) I'll work on these fixes and repost tonight. --Karim (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9904 released
|
|
Parts Authors: don't forget to update the Parts Tracker pages. Please mark your parts which are in the LCAD9904 update (and don't need more work). I have to post these reminders as penance for continually forgetting to do my updates. Steve LDraw (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where should I center this one?
|
|
(...) Whoops, you're right. But, in the case of the 1x2 plates and bricks, the centerpoint is on level with the top of a plane, and on the rectangular lattice formed by the studs. As for the 2x5 and 2x9 hinge plates, these are a real exception. (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to Primitives Committee:
|
|
(...) Quick update: I'm in favor of these files (I need one of them for the 3x3x2 cone!) Last night, I asked the other members of the committee for feedback. Some corrections are needed on these files: 1. They should each have a standard header. (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) it would be no problem to model the coils/wraps with *any* cross-section shape in the universe.. the reason i went with a diamond was simply to reduce the number of faces that would have to be rendered... i figured that the metal portion of (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9904 released
|
|
(...) If there's any problem with the parts I've done, just tell me and I'll fix them but as Jeff said they line up correctly, the only problem could be the orientation. Leonardo (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9904 released
|
|
(...) all (...) to (...) Okie Dokie. I wasn't sure if there was anything being done on the subject. ;) Jeff (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How big is your VEC dir?
|
|
(...) I've made LDLite save 8 bit bitmaps and sent the changes to Paul about 1 month ago but he didn't answer me. I wonder if he didn't get the message or if he just didn't like what I've done. :) Leonardo (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Terry Keller writes: (about my file COILTEST.DAT in LUGNET.CAD.DAT.PARTS) [snip] (...) It wasn't difficult at all, I just did a copy of the spring section lines from the shock absorber shortcut file, and did a paste two times in a (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How big is your VEC dir?
|
|
(...) Thanks for that, Steve. Another thing I need to do. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How big is your VEC dir?
|
|
(...) Just to provide a more-or-less final answer to this question, Image Magick includes mogrify.exe, which is designed to do mass file conversions. Using mogrify, I converted all the VEC images to BMP-RLE format. Which took the VEC down to 6.5MB. (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
