To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 1860
1859  |  1861
Subject: 
Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Tue, 25 May 1999 14:39:53 GMT
Viewed: 
680 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Manfred Moolhuysen writes:
Is it possible to model the coil with a narrower or more rounded cross
section? this would reduce the scaling problems.
Thanks, Manfred,

it would be no problem to model the coils/wraps with *any* cross-section shape
in the universe.. the reason i went with a diamond was simply to reduce the
number of faces that would have to be rendered... i figured that the metal
portion of the spring was small enough that it didn't need much detail, so
having the renderer tackle fewer faces just makes things run faster for
everyone, no matter what proggy they are using (LDraw, LEdit, LDLite, POV-
Ray)... i have a tendancy to put too much detail in all my modeling work, so
when doing LDraw elements i make an extra effort to pare things down, keeping
in mind that we aren't dealing with professionally-optimized software... if
the community wants a more-detailed cross-section, you can have it. no
problemo!.. i'm just sort of sitting back waiting for the concensus on this
one, i can tackle pretty much any decision we agree upon..

J



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
 
(...) Yes, the consensus. That is the tough part. I do think that, whichever way we decide to go, that the cross-section should have a little more roundness to it. The output in POV-Ray is proof of that. OK people, how about this: Manfreds (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
 
In lugnet.cad.dev, Terry Keller writes: (about my file COILTEST.DAT in LUGNET.CAD.DAT.PARTS) [snip] (...) It wasn't difficult at all, I just did a copy of the spring section lines from the shock absorber shortcut file, and did a paste two times in a (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

12 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR