Subject:
|
Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 May 1999 09:58:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1005 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 21 May 1999 09:18:16 GMT, "Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn"
<nzlijn@euronet.nl> wrote:
> > > I've worked out a small test DAT-file with the uncompressed spring and a
> > > compressed spring using scaling next to each other. The DAT-file uses the
> > > subfiles 2909c and 2909d included in the vote. In Ldraw, it doesn't look bad
> > > at all.
> > > I can't check POV, I don't have enough comp-power for high resolution.
> > >
> > > If someone is interested, I can send the test DAT-file to him, just mail a
> > > request to my personal e-mail address.
> > >
> > > Greetings, M. Moolhuysen.
> >
> >
> > Why not post it to dat.parts?
> >
> > -- Terry K --
>
> O.K. I've finaly succeeded in posting COILTEST.DAT to the LUGNET.CAD.DAT.PARTS
> group. So check it out there.
>
> Greetings, M. Moolhuysen.
Cool. OK, doing a 640x480 rendering now....
While we're all virtually waiting, I'd like to know how long it took you to
create the dat file, and your assesment of the difficulty of doing so.
It does look pretty good in LDlite, which is a plus.
OK, done. First, I must say that the uncompressed spring shows some obvious
imperfections. The coils are noticeably "V" shaped on the outer side. And the
tight section at the bottom appears as multiple flat faces. <sigh>
The compressed version looks about the way I would expect. Not terrible, but
the cross-section limitations seen in the uncompressed version are aggravated
by the the scaling. Makes the coil appear very flat.
Now, tossing this up to a temp directory on Hugin.... (semi-real time
operations - what fun!)
tick... tick.... ding!
http://hugin.ldraw.org/JJ_Memorial/hose/coils-test.jpg
Thanks, Manfred,
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
| (...) the (...) "It's slinky, it's slinky, a wonder- wonderful toy . . ." What we need is a torus primitive for this which L3P can subsitute. Terry, have you done any POVs of the whole assembly at a smaller scale? -John Van (26 years ago, 22-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev, Terry Keller writes: (about my file COILTEST.DAT in LUGNET.CAD.DAT.PARTS) [snip] (...) It wasn't difficult at all, I just did a copy of the spring section lines from the shock absorber shortcut file, and did a paste two times in a (...) (26 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
