Subject:
|
Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 May 1999 09:18:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
787 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Terry Keller writes:
> On Tue, 11 May 1999 11:21:13 GMT, "Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn"
> <nzlijn@euronet.nl> wrote:
>
> > -----Original message-----
> > From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com>
> > To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com>
> > Date: dinsdag 11 mei 1999 4:38
> > Subject: Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
> >
> >
> > I've worked out a small test DAT-file with the uncompressed spring and a
> > compressed spring using scaling next to each other. The DAT-file uses the
> > subfiles 2909c and 2909d included in the vote. In Ldraw, it doesn't look bad
> > at all.
> > I can't check POV, I don't have enough comp-power for high resolution.
> >
> > If someone is interested, I can send the test DAT-file to him, just mail a
> > request to my personal e-mail address.
> >
> > Greetings, M. Moolhuysen.
>
>
> Why not post it to dat.parts?
>
> -- Terry K --
O.K. I've finaly succeeded in posting COILTEST.DAT to the LUGNET.CAD.DAT.PARTS
group. So check it out there.
Greetings, M. Moolhuysen.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
| (...) Cool. OK, doing a 640x480 rendering now.... While we're all virtually waiting, I'd like to know how long it took you to create the dat file, and your assesment of the difficulty of doing so. It does look pretty good in LDlite, which is a plus. (...) (26 years ago, 22-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
