 | | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Not funny? I thought I was being pretty witty. :-) -- Terry K -- (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) All I have of Steve's that was not included is the 309p01 baseplate. And I also have Chris's two saddles. So far that is it. OTOH, the the rubber boat is awaiting some further work. The harpoon, knife, and the new 9v motor were held and will (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | bug found in parts
|
|
i have found a problem with the minifig robot leg silver area subparts. they do not say official lcad update... they still say unofficial element (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | desperatly seeking mock-up parts
|
|
i am desperatly seeking someone who can make the folowing parts as mock-up the long bow (for the archers in my siege scene) the arrow bag (ditto) any 1 of the folowing (so i can have 2 different armies in my siege scene) black knights shield (to go (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] Could a few people test something, please?
|
|
Give me a break, will ya?. P133, remember? :-/ I do have a significant portion of my VEC converted to 25-colors. I did it several updates ago, but have not maintained it. -- Terry K -- (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on Part 30384
|
|
windscreen canopy x by x by x??? i think that is the best place for it. (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Working on Part 30384
|
|
I just started part 30384, the Naboo Fighter Canopy. I have a couple of questions: 1) There is a little divvet on the nose of the canopy. This seems to be a molding artifact, but it looks like it is a regular and prominent one. Should this be (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Don't take me wrong, I get the joke, it's just that I want those parts really badly. Ryan "Build or build not. There is no try." - Lego Master Yoda ***...*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***...*** (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) versions (...) btw, after i posted i came across another message of yours where you *had* grasped the rub in this situation... hmmm... i think that might be a decent idea... modeling various compressions would be painless.. i could tear them (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) actually.. that *is* funny!.. he he heh eeh eh e heh eh e he (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) cinderella, cinderella, all i ever hear is cinderella... hehehhee. just kidding... FG addressed this to me personally when i presented the part... and i agree with him that this is important (especially since i was the one who started all the (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
onyx <onyx@flash.net> wrote in message news:FBJEHG.E04@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) Yup, undoubtedly more than my attempt at explaination. I think if you gave us correctly scaled coils at 100 LDU, 80 LDU, 60 LDU, and 50 LDU, we could use (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jeff Boen writes: one last addition on this subject from me... the only drawback to my method of custom building a spring of X length, made from the existing subparts, is that no matter how "compressed" the spring was in your (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) i'm not sure if you and steve are completely clear on what terry and i are concerned about... and even if the two of you are, i'll lay it out for everyone else that might be hazy on why this "compression" "no compression" "scaling" etc etc etc (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] Could a few people test something, please?
|
|
Pentium 166 with 32 RAM, nothing in the VEC directory (I use LDList) (without a VEC directory, VECCheck crashes): 5/10/99 5:39:40 PM VEC.Initialize - csStart 5/10/99 5:39:42 PM VEC.Initialize - csPartProfileWait 5/10/99 5:39:42 PM VEC.Initialize - (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) i *am* reading (although i've been out of the loop for a couple of weeks, had to go off and be "best man" at my best friend's wedding)... i *like* karim's idea... but... i don't know if that would just be complicating a process that we could (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) The inputs for such a program should be the x,y,z coordinates of both end points of the shock. That way, since you are using a seperate proggy to generate the shock, it might as well generate the whole shock, including rotation. It would be (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Cone primitives
|
|
I just realized the 1-4con3.dat and 1-4con4.dat don't have optional lines in them. Is there a reason for this, or is it just an oversight? -John Van (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Yes there is at least one other Train minifig who be classed as a "worker" - he has a red jerkin with a zip front and dots. Chris (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
So, Terry, since John's going to send them to you, are you going to make a quick update and ask everyone to vote again??? I don't think I could stand waiting more than another month for those parts. :-) Ryan "Build or build not. There is no try." - (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
