 | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) It took me a while to bend my mind around this one, but now I see Terry's point. Think of a cross-section of the metal of the spring itself what you would see if you snipped it with wire-cutters (perish the thought). You would see a circle on (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
So much for trying to be funny without reading all previous posts. -John Van Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn <nzlijn@euronet.nl> wrote in message news:004901be9ae4$32...0@n0079... (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3736dc07.459525...net.com... (...) The (...) center (...) The (...) Maybe I could work up a spreadsheet to calculate (based on the total length of the spring) the correct compression of (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
The harpoon, knife, and 9V motor were in the last vote but either needed changes or we were waiting on the chrome numbering discusion. I did make the fixes and sent them to Terry. The knife should be the only one to require voting, as the others (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Sorry, but I blew it! I've been creating parts and posting them on Lugnet, but not sending them to Terry. Time to get out the wiffle bats, everyone! I'll get these into Terry today. -John Van SCOTT R DENNETT <dennett@agate.net> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Oh, come on. That's not funny :( Seriously, what happened, I thought that he had made the neceassary changes right after he got the sets?? I really need them. Could someone possibly send me the dats that they have of them so I can use them as a (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Why would it appear oval? The scaling would be along the Y axis. The only difference in appearance would be that the windings would not be as steeply spiralled. Which is a correct appearance. Of course, my opinion is that the most-correct (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Interesting. At least one or two of these are parts that I sent to you, but must not have arrived. I will resend. Steve (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: maandag 10 mei 1999 13:09 Subject: Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat (...) Terry answered: (...) If we (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] Could a few people test something, please?
|
|
Ouch! 30 seconds for the whole thing? Wow. Good thing there's room for improved performance in the algorithms. BTW, have you (or anyone) converted the VEC image files to 256-colors? (this would only affect the "csLoadPictures" steps) Steve (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Another negative thing I see with this method is that the dat file _must_ be manually edited to affect the scaling change. It can't be done from LEdit. This is what makes it difficult - at least for the casual user. Karim's method can be done (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) But this kind of thing isn't done for other parts, is it? Take the bushes, wheels, gear cogs and so on; they must all be rotated to fit the axles. (...) We could just argue that the cam is essentially a pulley/wheel kind of part, rather than a (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
-----Original message----- From: jonathan wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: zondag 9 mei 1999 14:19 Subject: Re: Voting Page (...) Are we sure that train workers are dressed with this (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: maandag 10 mei 1999 4:05 Subject: Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat (...) Terry answered: (...) The idea (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) I believe all of John VanZ's SW parts are due to be released on the 19th. :-) -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Good point. An alternate idea would be to rotate it 90 degrees in the Y-plane. That would place its default position in perfect alignment with all the axles default positions. What does everyone think? Leave it as-is? Lay it down flat? Rotate (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Not sure about that one. That is kind of iffy. The term "chevron" is a pretty good description of the pattern. "worker" doesn't really add anything, as obviously the minifig is a train worker. (...) Good catch. "Shield Ovoid" would be the (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Hmm... let's see.... Ooh, ick. Yes. I will add that one as well. Good catch. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Leave it to Karim to be clever. :-) A very interesting idea. I am somewhat chagrined to have not thought of it myself. The only difficulty is the precise rotation needed. But I expect that the simplest way of using this assembly will be by (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) The pieces submitted are in the vote. If it is not there, it has not been formally submitted. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
