 | | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) Pretty strong. I have given up for now looking for real content on news://news.povray.o...cene-files because 95%+ of the messages are nothing but discussion, requests, and flames (not the POVRay kind, unfortunately). (...) Nope. Murphey's Law (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) Netscape Communicator 4.5 handles it pretty well. (...) I open up .cad in a new window. (...) Good point. If I want instant gratification, I use the Web interface. Can you implement a way to make the messages with DAT content stand out on the (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on Part 30357
|
|
(...) The password is "modeling" (or "modeler", I get confused sometimes). Fortunately, MSIE5 stores the password for my, so I don't have to remember or type it anymore :-) -John Van (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Part: 30357
|
|
Karim <knassar@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3727B914.45C2B8...ing.com... (...) See discussion of optional lines below. (...) I think that as long as it accomodates studs where they need to go, which it appears to, and looks close enough, (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [Part] 3841.dat Minifig Tool Pickaxe [DAT]
|
|
Alright! A new talent! Your part is well done and complete, congratulations. This part would easily be voted in, so my furthur suggestions are just that, suggestions for improving your "craft" as a part author. First, when posting you parts to (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) Because then .cad.dat would become too clogged with multiple types of discussions -- models, parts, primitives, ideas, etc. And people have different interests. There is great utility in having focused groups for each of these, which people (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) Just as a side note, when I encounter the same situation, I just press "^" to see the original article, even if it is in a different newsgroup. Some readers (software) may not support this feature, which probably makes this practice annoying, (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
Sproaticus skrev i meddelandet <372473FF.4BCB8A59@g...es.com>... (...) That is, (...) namely (...) frustrating (...) threads, (...) find the (...) ng. (...) OTOH, it would be easier to follow the discussion, if the model _and_ discussion is in the (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) ---...--- Imre Papp Geometria GIS Systems House email: ipapp@geometria.hu ---...--- (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) How do you follow the threads across groups? What newsreader do you use? What do you do when you're in the .cad.dat group and you want to see if there are any followups yet to the post you're reading? When you do find a model in the .cad.dat (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) Well, that would kind of bring things full-circle then, huh? :) The reason for dividing up .cad.dat, BTW, is (a) to help organize [at a very superficial first-order layer] postings about parts, models, ideas, etc., and (b) to help focus the (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) How strongly do you really feel about that? It seems to me that all one has to do to find the source is to climb to the top of the thread tree, which can be done by looking for the absence of "Re:" in the Subject line, or by clicking the (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Working on Part 30357
|
|
I just had a sudden urge to do some part authoring again and decided to do 30357, the 3x3 plate w/ round corner that is in the SW Landspeeder set. I checked the parts tracker and its not there, but I can't remember the password to add it myself. (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst [DAT]
|
|
(...) Part #30079 is mis-positioned. It is not aligned for easy placement. I don't remember the exact numbers, maybe you have to move the piece up by -3LDU to 'click' it into a model, I don't remember. There was discussion about correcting the part, (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst [DAT]
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: woensdag 28 april 1999 8:18 Subject: Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst (...) Terry, do you remember this: (note: (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Shell Extension DLL for lcd and dat files
|
|
(...) OK. It says it is successfully installed. But nothing happens when I try to use it with dat files. For that matter, I have MS Word for Win95 version 7.00, and it doesn't do anything like that for .doc files either. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
|
(...) Me too. Numbers are not my strong point. Just ask Joshua. ;-) (...) Any time you feel like doing so. When it is ready, I will add it into an update. (...) OK. I will strive to ensure that all ~Moved to files continue to have that format. (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst [DAT]
|
|
(...) Something is just not clicking in my noggin. It seems to me that all you would want to replace would be the filename. Are you saying that the mover should grab the _entire_ line: 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5678.dat from the ~Moved to file, (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars light sabre blade
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3725e722.337449...net.com... (...) matter (...) You could be right. I thought it was put there to help hold the blade in place in the hilt. but I could be wrong. -John Van (25 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars light sabre blade
|
|
(...) I assumed it was a artifact from the molding process (like the two circles which are on the other side of the blade from the notch). I didn't really consider modeling it in. It wouldn't be hard to do, but I'm not seeing the benefit. Steve (25 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
