Subject:
|
RE: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:20:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
585 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd wrote:
>
> I'm working toward
> getting discussions (all across the board at LUGNET) as closely coupled
> with
> and linked to data as possible -- physically, metaphysically,
> logically,
> metalogically, mentally, psychologically, sociopsycologically, umm,
> foofoologically, umm, metaüberpharmacobiologically, etc. :-)
>
> I agree with that dat postings and comments should be closely related.
> Why isn't enough simply decide that comments on dat postings should be
> sent back strait to cad.dat?
>
> This way every new dat posting (part, model, etc) could start a new
> thread and comments/discussion could follow it in the thread. But in
> this case replies would be messages not containing dat file at all, and
> this could hurt the rule that cad.dat serves only for posting dat
> files.
>
> Ampi
---------------------------------------
Imre Papp
Geometria GIS Systems House
email: ipapp@geometria.hu
---------------------------------------
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | RE: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
| (...) Because then .cad.dat would become too clogged with multiple types of discussions -- models, parts, primitives, ideas, etc. And people have different interests. There is great utility in having focused groups for each of these, which people (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
