Subject:
|
Re: Unofficial Part: 30357
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Apr 1999 15:33:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
836 times
|
| |
|
|
Karim <knassar@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3727B914.45C2B810@mindspring.com...
> OK! Here is it, My second Part. This is pretty complete. I haven't
> quite figured out how to do optional lines though. The end of the file
> has a list of surfaces that need optional lines. I'm still working on
> this. I wanted to get feedback from Part Authors on this part.
See discussion of optional lines below.
> There is one inaccuracy in the part, where the stud clearance is, if you
> look at the underside of the part, there is a strange little squiggle
> shape on each side of the clearance. I got as close as I could measure
> the dimensions of this feature It's not quite right, but I think it
> might be close enough to be acceptable (no flames, please!). Anyway,
> since I'm not sure about this feature, I figured I ask the Real Part
> Authors (TM) what they thought.
I think that as long as it accomodates studs where they need to go, which it
appears to, and looks close enough, it's fine.
> Also Note, that the rounded corner on this piece is a 1/4 circle, but
> that I didn't use the 1-4disc primitive. My justification for this is
> that this piece seems to be intended to be combined with 3063 (macaroni
> brick) which also doesn't use the primitive. I ended up using the same
> curve as 3063, so that when you stack them, the curve is continuous. If
> this is unacceptable, please let me know. I don't want to do any work
> on the optional lines until I get a verdict on this.
Interesting. Because of the very noticable difference in POV-Ray when
circle-based primitives are used, I would suggest using the disc and cyli
primitives whenever possible. Perhaps we should update the macaroni brick to
use the primitive's as well.
> --Karim
>
>
> 0 Optional Lines These Surfaces
> 0 4 16 10 8 50 10 0 50
> 0 4 16 17.80 8 49.23 25.31 8 46.96 25.31 0 46.96 17.80 0 49.23
The optional line between these two surfaces would be:
5 24 17.80 8 49.23 17.80 0 49.23 10 8 50 25.31 8 46.96 -or-
5 24 17.80 8 49.23 17.80 0 49.23 10 0 50 25.31 0 46.96 -or-
5 24 17.80 8 49.23 17.80 0 49.23 10 8 50 25.31 0 46.96 -or-
5 24 17.80 8 49.23 17.80 0 49.23 10 0 50 25.31 8 46.96 -or-
If two surfaces are arranged like this:
a -- c -- e
| | |
b -- d -- f
then the optional line between them would be any of the following:
5 24 c d a e
a f
b e
b f
Hope this is clear enough to help!
-John Van
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Unofficial Part: 30357
|
| (...) OK, then before I finish this part, could we have a quick discussion on this among the Parts Authors? (1) (...) Big help. I get it now. Thanks :) --Karim [1] "I was not elected to watch my pieces suffer and DIE while you discuss this (...) (26 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Unofficial Part: 30357 [DAT]
|
| OK! Here is it, My second Part. This is pretty complete. I haven't quite figured out how to do optional lines though. The end of the file has a list of surfaces that need optional lines. I'm still working on this. I wanted to get feedback from Part (...) (26 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dat)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
