|  |  | Re: How big is your VEC dir? 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Heck, yeah! I gotta have that shading, man! :-, I'm rendering at 100%, too. I tried 50% and 75% for a while, but I lost too much detail to be comfortable with it. Cheers, - jsproat    (27 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: How big is your VEC dir? 
 | 
 | 
| (...) What the heck ya got in there, man?? As of the latest update, mine is ~8 Mb, rendered in LDraw at 50%. Did you use LDLite to render the VEC? That's more than my entire LDraw directory! :) Jeff - Who can't believe anyone can actually get 79 Mb (...)   (27 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: How big is your VEC dir? 
 | 
 | 
| (...) I've just finished updating the source and sent the changes to Paul, hope he likes the way I've changed LDL :) (...)    (27 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts) 
 | 
 | 
| (...) OK, they're done. Besides drawing the non-patterned areas, I also moved the original pattern-commands to z=-10. Steve    (27 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: [ldraw.org] L3P Question 
 | 
 | 
| (...) That makes sense. I will take a closer look at it. I have gotten into the habit of using LEdit coordinates as a reference for scene locations. Done right, it is a handy way of figuring out translation coordinates for various elements. -- Terry (...)   (27 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: How big is your VEC dir? 
 | 
 | 
| Ya gotta love that logic. :-) -- Terry K -- (...)    (27 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: How big is your VEC dir? 
 | 
 | 
| Hmmm. A 6.4 GB drive is $124 at Fry's today, for a cost of roughly $0.01 USD per 0.5 MB. If we assume this option saves 22 MB for each of the 500 LDLite users, the net savings to the entire world will amount to $220, which is probably worth an hour (...)   (27 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts) 
 | 
 | 
| (...) wrote: (...) 9326-4t.dat (...) is (...) Sure, go ahead if you have the time, or let me know if you'd prefer me to fix them. I didn't realise these were still in need of work - were these the early ones I did where I painted the decoration at (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon? 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Ah, cool. I hadn't noticed that application. Kind of wobbly, but it works. (...) I'm sure your meas-timates are at least as good as mine, so it's not worth re-doing all of your work. (...) That's how I would have done it. Not much fun. (...) (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon? 
 | 
 | 
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <371a91f5.3600445@lu...et.com>... (...) Excellent, then I think the gap in the bottom should be drawn. I could be used to mount the cannon on an antenna or other 8 ldu width rod. (...) I meas-timated the radii as 4.5 (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: [Newpart] - #2871, Electric Train  9V Motor Decorative Side 
 | 
 | 
| -----Original message----- From: jonathan wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> To: lugnet.cad@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad@lugnet.com>; lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: zaterdag 17 april 1999 1:18 Subject: Re: [Newpart] - #2871, (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | RE: [ldraw.org] L3P Question 
 | 
 | 
| Terry Keller wrote on Saturday, April 17, 1999: (...) Well, it tells you the extent and position of the model, which I find indispensable when trying to place several models in a scene. /Lars    (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | RE: Status of SW Ion Cannon? 
 | 
 | 
| John VanZwieten wrote on Saturday, April 17, 1999: (...) I (...) the (...) All 3 cone primitives (4-4con12.dat, 1-4con3.dat, 1-4con4.dat) have POV equivalents in L3P. Unfortunately in v1.1 the 1-4 cones are clipped by a too small box, (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon? 
 | 
 | 
| (...) I believe the newest L3P is totally up-to-date on primitive substitutions, but the previous did not substitute all cones. BTW, which cones did you use? I meas-timated the radii as 5 and 9, so the existing conic primitives don't fit very well. (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts) 
 | 
 | 
| (...) And I will take care of the back-sides as well. Chris, is it OK with you if I finish the detailing of the two torsos (dungarees and BT2, I think) that reference 9326.dat, instead of 9326-4t.dat? They both need to have the undecorated surface (...)   (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy 
 | 
 | 
| (...) I know it is, and I thought I already knew your answer. I just wanted to let you know I wasn't trying to be pushy, or expect something for nothing. Steve    (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts) 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Chris, Steve Bliss has volunteered to do all the labor. :-) -- Terry K --    (27 years ago, 18-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts) 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Yes, I agree, but this will mean more work to change the existing decorated torsos - adding three extra quads as well as changing the call to 9326-4t.dat and changing that subpart. I can do this, but it will take a little time - is that OK? (...)   (27 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: www.ldraw.org Registration Sent 
 | 
 | 
| I'll follow up with Tim offline but I'm pleased to make the following offer: I'll contribute either whatever Tim's short for the initial registration, or match the amount that Tim's over up to a limit of 100... that is if everyone else contributes (...)   (27 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: [ldraw.org] Domain Registration 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Right.. Now that the name is on its way to being registered, I'm starting to think more and more about the design. Choosing a font is tough, and I know some might give me flak for being so worried about astethics, but I want this site to be (...)   (27 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev) 
 |