Subject:
|
Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Apr 1999 02:15:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2446 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Apr 1999 05:18:51 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 1999 22:26:23 GMT, "Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.cad.dev, Terry Keller writes:
> > > On Fri, 16 Apr 1999 12:38:18 GMT, Leonardo Zide <leonardo@centroin.com.br>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Terry K wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I absolutely agree to this. 9326-4t.dat does not belong in \parts.
> > > > > Hmm... how many are there? Little over a dozen? Yeah, I could do that.
> > > > > But I might be lazy and just leave it with the same file name.
> > > >
> > > > If we're going to change all torsos, why not remove the faces from
> > > > their back as well ? There are some minifigs that have patterns in the
> > > > back (like the one from the xtreme team) and in the future someone will
> > > > probably model them.
> > >
> > > That would be a wise idea. Chris?
> > >
> > > -- Terry K --
> > Yes, I agree, but this will mean more work to change the existing decorated
> > torsos - adding three extra quads as well as changing the call to 9326-4t.dat
> > and changing that subpart. I can do this, but it will take a little time - is
> > that OK?
>
> Chris, Steve Bliss has volunteered to do all the labor. :-)
And I will take care of the back-sides as well.
Chris, is it OK with you if I finish the detailing of the two torsos
(dungarees and BT2, I think) that reference 9326.dat, instead of
9326-4t.dat? They both need to have the undecorated surface filled in.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
