Subject:
|
Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Apr 1999 02:31:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
874 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Apr 1999 00:18:27 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
<john_vanzwieten@msn.com> wrote:
> Well, the cone with cutout just happens to be what I've been working on. I
> used 3 1-4 cones around the top and sides. Does L3P substitute for all the
> cone primitives? In any case I'll post what I've got to cad.dat, probably
> tommorow.
I believe the newest L3P is totally up-to-date on primitive substitutions,
but the previous did not substitute all cones.
BTW, which cones did you use? I meas-timated the radii as 5 and 9, so the
existing conic primitives don't fit very well. I guess using two
overlapping 1-4con3.dat's would be best, one scaled to 1.66667, the other
at 2.25.
How did you handle the cutout not being along the radial planes of the
cone? That was the reason I was procrastinating on implementing this
section of the part.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon?
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <371a91f5.3600445@lu...et.com>... (...) Excellent, then I think the gap in the bottom should be drawn. I could be used to mount the cannon on an antenna or other 8 ldu width rod. (...) I meas-timated the radii as 4.5 (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Status of SW Ion Cannon?
|
| Well, the cone with cutout just happens to be what I've been working on. I used 3 1-4 cones around the top and sides. Does L3P substitute for all the cone primitives? In any case I'll post what I've got to cad.dat, probably tommorow. -John Van (...) (26 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
