To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 1458
1457  |  1459
Subject: 
Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Mon, 19 Apr 1999 22:06:47 GMT
Viewed: 
2438 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> On Sun, 18 Apr 1999 05:18:51 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 17 Apr 1999 22:26:23 GMT, "Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> • wrote:
> > 
> > > In lugnet.cad.dev, Terry Keller writes:
> > > > On Fri, 16 Apr 1999 12:38:18 GMT, Leonardo Zide <leonardo@centroin.com.br>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Terry K wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I absolutely agree to this.  9326-4t.dat does not belong in \parts.
> > > > > > Hmm... how many are there?  Little over a dozen?  Yeah, I could do that.
> > > > > > But I might be lazy and just leave it with the same file name.
> > > > > 
> > > > >  If we're going to change all torsos, why not remove the faces from
> > > > > their back as well ? There are some minifigs that have patterns in the
> > > > > back (like the one from the xtreme team) and in the future someone will
> > > > > probably model them.
> > > > 
> > > > That would be a wise idea.  Chris?
> > > > 
> > > > -- Terry K --
> > > Yes, I agree, but this will mean more work to change the existing decorated
> > > torsos - adding three extra quads as well as changing the call to • 9326-4t.dat
> > > and changing that subpart. I can do this, but it will take a little time - • is
> > > that OK?
> > 
> > Chris, Steve Bliss has volunteered to do all the labor.  :-)
> 
> And I will take care of the back-sides as well.
> 
> Chris, is it OK with you if I finish the detailing of the two torsos
> (dungarees and BT2, I think) that reference 9326.dat, instead of
> 9326-4t.dat?  They both need to have the undecorated surface filled in.
> 
> Steve
Sure, go ahead if you have the time, or let me know if you'd prefer me to fix
them. I didn't realise these were still in need of work - were these the early
ones I did where I painted the decoration at z=-10.1 ? If so it will just as
difficult for me to fix, since they date from before I was rigourous about
drawing the detail on graph paper first.

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts)
 
(...) OK, they're done. Besides drawing the non-patterned areas, I also moved the original pattern-commands to z=-10. Steve (27 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Minifig torso subpart (was suggestion for roadplate like parts)
 
(...) And I will take care of the back-sides as well. Chris, is it OK with you if I finish the detailing of the two torsos (dungarees and BT2, I think) that reference 9326.dat, instead of 9326-4t.dat? They both need to have the undecorated surface (...) (27 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

16 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR