 | | Re: mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) Cool. Hmm, which to choose... It makes less work for me doing it the mailing list way, because of the incoming gateway translations at the e-mail level. What do we want to call it here? lugnet.cad.ldraw-tech? lugnet.cad.ldraw.tech? --Todd (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) we can easily also tell mailman to post each email to the mailing list to a group on the NNTP server. Dan (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I would rephrase that... under the most prevalent current limitation scheme being floated, (LSC eligible==LSC voting eligible) you would not be able to, and I would barely squeak by. Certainly other schemes could be floated, with different (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) Aha -- yes, that would work too -- and is extremely easy to set up. In fact, if you wanted to make it read-only on LUGNET (so that the only way to post is via the mailing list on ldraw.org), all we need to do is subscribe an address (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only
|
|
(...) If it's the current version of Mesa (5.0.1), and it's been configured with the correct ./configure switches, then no, I don't see why using a symlink would cause any problems. Anyhow, I just patched things up to work with the latest sources. (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only
|
|
(...) I had done that (I thought). And now I have done it again. Same result. I suppose I should admit that I cheated a little bit, and just used a symlink to the directory containing Mesa (to keep my directory structure clean). But is there any (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only (Was: Parts Tracker Status)
|
|
(...) Or more likely, (since I just got the same result myself) is that I created the stubs and the new makefile for the stock 0.9.5 sources instead of the latest CVS sources since that's what I had lying around. Apparently I need a few more stubs (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only (Was: Parts Tracker Status)
|
|
(...) I only glanced at the list of errors, but maybe this is the problem. If you already built ldglite then you have to start over from scratch with the new makefile. Unfortunately my makefile skills are not the best. There's no "make clean". So (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only (Was: Parts Tracker Status)
|
|
(...) [...] (...) I should probably have written that it is on a Red Hat (mostly) 7.3 system with some kind of x86 processor. Play well, Jacob -- City X'ers mail van (building instructions): (URL) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only (Was: Parts Tracker Status)
|
|
[ XFUT lugnet.cad.dev ] (...) So far it works fine, but ... (...) This fails. Here's the end of the output from the build: ---...--- gcc -g -DUNIX -DUSE_OPENGL -DUSE_L3_PARSER -DUSE_BMP8 -DNEED_MIN_MAX -DUSE_PNG -DTILE_RENDER_OPTION -DOSMESA_OPTION (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-tech Mailing List/Update
|
|
(...) (URL) is the archives. -Tim (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw-tech Mailing List/Update
|
|
Everyone - I noted the existance of the LDraw-tech mailing list in this LDraw.org article: (URL) never noted it on LUGNET. So... While we were recovering from the downtime, Dan and Steve set up the tech mailing list, to keep everyone involved on (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: I can't send James Reynolds mail
|
|
Chris, Try james.e.reynolds@m.cc.utah.edu. James (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | I can't send James Reynolds mail
|
|
James, I got two messages from you, so I replied that your messages got through. Both messages bounced back. Here is a compy of one of the messages that bounced back. From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@smtp....l.rcn.net> Date: Thu May 15, (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Status (offscreen part rendering)
|
|
(...) Or you could build and link with static versions of the Mesa libraries. Then you just have to worry about the one executable. In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Don Heyse writes: (...) Ok, I tried this and it seems to work. Here's how: Grab the (...) (21 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I see your points and agree with 2 and 3, but only partially with 1. Anyways, there's about equal response for or against limitations. Not totally sure on what to do - I'll let it simmer for a bit. (I should note that if there was no (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Bendible parts Web Page
|
|
Yeah! I can't say right now that I would use it, but I have wanted the ability every now and then. And I am always for any software that will run on Macintosh, even if it is through a webpage (which is what you describe sounds like). James (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Bendible parts Web Page
|
|
I was think of creating a webpage with a script based on my LDDP plugin to create the code for flexible objects. This would allow those who, for whatever reason, cannot use LDDP to create bendible objects. Is there any interest in this? -Orion (21 years ago, 11-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView parts smoothing bug?
|
|
(...) Yep, it's a bug. Thanks for the report. I'm going to have to think for a while on how to fix it. If you make sure that 30191.dat shows up in your model before 30190.dat, the problem will go away. It's caused because LDView doesn't smooth (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDView parts smoothing bug? [DAT]
|
|
Have a look at the attched file in LDView. Part 32190 smoothes correctly, part 30191 does not. Part 30190 is only a mirror image reference to part 30191 and both are in the PARTS directory. Is this a problem? -Orion 0 Panel Test 0 Name: (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
