| | Re: Help working the Non-CA and L(EGO)Draw parts queue
|
|
(...) Thx for pointing to - must have slipped my eagle eyes ;-) w. PS. And thx for polishing the Mechanical Arm Straight. (15 years ago, 24-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Help working the Non-CA and L(EGO)Draw parts queue
|
|
(...) This one is also on the parts tracker: (URL) (15 years ago, 22-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Help working the Non-CA and L(EGO)Draw parts queue
|
|
(...) (URL) already on the PT mikeheide (15 years ago, 19-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Help working the Non-CA and L(EGO)Draw parts queue
|
|
(...) (15 years ago, 19-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Help working the Non-CA and L(EGO)Draw parts queue
|
|
Hi folks, first of all a big "Thank you" to all the authores how have contributed re-writing Non-CA parts or get the so-called L(EGO)Draw parts (coming from the LEGO Group through the LEGO Universe team) fit for the PT. Some Non-CA parts still need (...) (15 years ago, 19-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Error in part 3641
|
|
(...) Thanks. I hadn't realized there were parts in the unoicial library to sibstitute official parts. Jetro (15 years ago, 10-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Error in part 3641
|
|
(...) Hello Jetro, This part in official version has indeed a lot of problems. But they have already been fixed in unofficial version on Parts Tracker: (URL) (15 years ago, 10-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Error in part 3641
|
|
When I open a file containing part #3641 (Tyre) in LDView I get a long list of errors similar to this one: Bad vertex sequence in BFC-enabled quad. File: C:/LDRAW/PARTS/3641.DAT Line #47 Line: 4 16 0 14 8 0 18 8 0 14 0 0 18 0 (Note: disabling BFC (...) (15 years ago, 10-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: 53533.dat
|
|
(...) I don't have the part :( Philo (15 years ago, 8-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
|
| | 53533.dat
|
|
Anyone working on the 53533 Technic liftarm? see : (URL) Is not in the official / unofficial LDRAW parts library. Regards, Ludo (15 years ago, 7-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: 57587.dat origin
|
|
(...) Interesting... I'm agreeing with you, as it seems other dome parts have their top pointing upwards so I shall do it this way. Thank you. (16 years ago, 9-May-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: 57587.dat origin
|
|
(...) I would rotate that part, so it is easier to identify this part as a dome. Then I think the top should be at Y=0. I have already send a manipulated version of your mpd file to your address. cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 8-May-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
|
| | 57587.dat origin
|
|
Hello all, I have recently been working on (URL).dat, "Technic Cylinder 6 x 6 x 4 with Dome Top" (though I have it here titled as "Technic Dome 7 x 7 x 5" because IMHO it's more like a dome than a cylinder). I've noticed the part origin is a problem (...) (16 years ago, 8-May-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Parts spreadsheet/tool?
|
|
(...) I plan on exporting a lot models to other formats, and need the parts to have correct winding. I basically just want to keep track of which parts have been BFC certified, and update and be ready to submit the ones that aren't when the need (...) (16 years ago, 25-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Parts spreadsheet/tool?
|
|
(...) Mike From the 2008-01 complete library re-release, the !LDRAW_ORG line in the header should uniquely identify the version of the part, as it always includes the parts update number (YYYY-NN or ORIGINAL). If you have installed unofficial parts, (...) (16 years ago, 22-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Parts spreadsheet/tool?
|
|
Does anyone have a spreadsheet or tool that will report statistics regarding installed parts? It should list information such as certifications, number of lines, last modification date, etc. Thanks. -Mike (16 years ago, 22-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Comments on some unofficial Train parts
|
|
(...) <SNIP>> (...) Thanks for this information. I have renamed 4093b to 4093c to leave space for the 6+3+6 hole version as 4093b. Chris (16 years ago, 19-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Comments on some unofficial Train parts
|
|
(...) All battery boxes mentioned consists of several single parts like (URL) maybe (URL) all what you are looking for should be available at the PT. I hope that helps cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 16-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Comments on some unofficial Train parts
|
|
(...) Thanks, I also think this is complete (good work!). I just suggested to split the "x560etc." into two parts, like: (URL) a question of what can be considered a part. Battery boxes are usually made of two "parts" in real life. I'm not sure if (...) (16 years ago, 16-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Comments on some unofficial Train parts
|
|
(...) SNIP I think you are talking about these battery boxes: your type 1 (URL) type 3 (note the opening for the contacts in the case) (URL) type 2 (URL) think this is complete. See also here: (URL) (16 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|