 | | Parts spreadsheet/tool?
|
|
Does anyone have a spreadsheet or tool that will report statistics regarding installed parts? It should list information such as certifications, number of lines, last modification date, etc. Thanks. -Mike (16 years ago, 22-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on some unofficial Train parts
|
|
(...) <SNIP>> (...) Thanks for this information. I have renamed 4093b to 4093c to leave space for the 6+3+6 hole version as 4093b. Chris (16 years ago, 19-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on some unofficial Train parts
|
|
(...) All battery boxes mentioned consists of several single parts like (URL) maybe (URL) all what you are looking for should be available at the PT. I hope that helps cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 16-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on some unofficial Train parts
|
|
(...) Thanks, I also think this is complete (good work!). I just suggested to split the "x560etc." into two parts, like: (URL) a question of what can be considered a part. Battery boxes are usually made of two "parts" in real life. I'm not sure if (...) (16 years ago, 16-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on some unofficial Train parts
|
|
(...) SNIP I think you are talking about these battery boxes: your type 1 (URL) type 3 (note the opening for the contacts in the case) (URL) type 2 (URL) think this is complete. See also here: (URL) (16 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Comments on some unofficial Train parts
|
|
Hello everyone, glad to see the traffic on Parts Tracker! As a railway fan I am double-glad to see some Train-specific parts developing. However, I have noticed some issues with part naming so I think it's better to solve them while the parts are (...) (16 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Updated Primitives Reference
|
|
(...) Don't worry Chris, we all know the precarious nature of unofficial stuff. But in the meantime it helps to have a quick reference of the shapes available! Philo (16 years ago, 7-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Updated Primitives Reference
|
|
(...) Sorry, but this is a bad idea. These primitives are unofficial - which means that before release the names might change. In fact some of them will definitely change. I don't like to break other peoples webpages, but this might happen now. (...) (16 years ago, 6-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Updated Primitives Reference
|
|
LDraw author J.C. Tchang has created an updated Primitives Reference, based on (URL) but including unofficial primitives on Parts Tracker as of 2008-12-08. It is available here: (URL) you can see it is written in French, but I hope that thanks to (...) (16 years ago, 20-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Official Parts using MLCad colors
|
|
Hi folks, working on the LDConfig file (URL) came across official parts that use colors present in MLCad but not the still official LDraw color chart: (URL) to mention a few: Color 430: 3811p02e.dat Color 431: 973p2e.dat Color 485: 973p4t.dat, (...) (16 years ago, 10-Feb-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: searching for people that have 1966-1970 electric parts
|
|
(...) Can you please check the thickness of the pins of the cables. I think the red single connectors are a little bit thinner than the gray double connectors. If so, we have to care about the difference in building the LDraw-Parts. If I am right, (...) (16 years ago, 4-Feb-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: searching for people that have 1966-1970 electric parts
|
|
(...) (URL) 002 - have 2 in working condition. Dave K (16 years ago, 3-Feb-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | searching for people that have 1966-1970 electric parts
|
|
I am searching for people that still have the electric parts that where produced during the time 1966 - 1970. If you have such parts, please leave a note here. As soon as I have my questions totally clear I will then ask in detail. cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 3-Feb-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: need help with 61808.dat
|
|
(...) The thing is that I got this far, but I don't know how to proceed. It's kind of split into three... First, the "wings" that, when assembled, cover the pump. I don't know how long should I make the quadrilaterals. I tried measuring but there (...) (16 years ago, 29-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: need help with 61808.dat
|
|
(...) Please tell us more exactly what problem you run into. So we can help to solve your problem. cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 29-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | need help with 61808.dat [DAT]
|
|
Hey, I've been working on 61808.dat, the Nynrah Ghostblaster, though I've ran into problems with it, which should be quite obvious with a person who hasn't been modeling parts for long and a part as complex as this. I want to get this ready one day, (...) (16 years ago, 29-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: what's wrong with the POTM email?
|
|
(...) And what about LSC email? I have a few issues to submit but got a bounce back a few minutes ago :( Philo (16 years ago, 29-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: what's wrong with the POTM email?
|
|
(...) The motm address should now be fixed. -Orion (16 years ago, 29-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: what's wrong with the POTM email?
|
|
(...) As far as I know Dan and Orion are still working to fix the addresses after we had changes in the DNS. Please send your POTM submissions to my privat address at: ldraw[at]holly-wood(.)it Bye, Willy LDraw Contest Coordinator (16 years ago, 27-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: what's wrong with the POTM email?
|
|
(...) There is a problem with all email to the adresses that ends with ldraw.org. I also do not know exactly what is the problem, but it seems to be bigger because it is still not fixed. (16 years ago, 26-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
