 | | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Hi Steve, Have you contacted Anton about this? He's not a bad guy and is willing to help where needed. Jeroen (23 years ago, 11-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part - Castle Wall
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Bernd Broich wrote: < snip...> (...) I'd rather call it challenging :-)) But you are right. It shouldn't be our usuall way of working. It is sufficient for mock-ups and that was my first intention. Because result was pretty good I (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
(...) I strongly recommend to any part author to also register as a part reviewer. Then at least you can reply comments to votes on your own parts. I am sure you have been listened and your preferences regarding reviewer attitude will be taken into (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part - Castle Wall
|
|
(...) It's a little bit risky to make a part only from instruction scans. But never mind it's nearly correct. I'll send you a picture from the bottom. CU Bernd (23 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part - Castle Wall
|
|
Dear All, I hit on an idea to build CAD model of Royal Knight's Castle from set 6090. In certain moment I found that one part from this set has been never created, so I decided to create it myself. It is a part 6055 named "Castle Wall 6 x 6 x 6 (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
(...) I can understand you. But I think primitives with are used by a lot of parts should be available to change by anyone. In the other hand a _part_ (or subpart) should never changed if it's on the PT. CU Bernd (23 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
[crossposted to lugnet.cad.dev, with followup-to set there as well -- this thread isn't about posting LDR files to lugnet] (...) If anyone is not sure about the general rule/protocol/guidelines on this: for new parts (not fixes), you should *always* (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive Class
|
|
(...) If we can only create outside sections,[1] why not keep the leading t, but change the i/o/q? Maybe x, for extended? As for the ratio decimals in the file name, instead of noting the tube:major ratio (which is >1), use the inverse major:tube (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
(...) Woah, hold it there cowboy. The ONLY fix I will apply to a part not already submitted as a fix would be to slightly adjust the part position. I feel that small and minor errors can be fixed by anyone and would only fly off the handle (ok, I (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
...yes, would you please ask PERMISSION before you mess up my code! Yes I'm angry, but I'm so sick! currently there is spreading a rude behaviour at the PT, especially by the reviewers. grabbing a part and fix an error before an author can get a (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
