 | | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) I know, I know, but I couldn't care much less. The parts I make are good enough for making instructions and overqualified for animations, but never good enough for the authorizing crew. It's no use, I won't even try to submit any more parts to (...) (23 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) Hi Tore, I'm not sure what to make of this. I think your parts are fantastic and I'm sure many people (myself included) enjoy them even with these insignificant flaws. I'd have thought your parts would have no problems with the official (...) (23 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) Tore- please don't stop submitting to the tracker. You consistently crank out great work, and I for one appreciate it. I'll happily take the trailer and ramp. -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com (23 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
I am very, very sorry for my childish overreaction to your relevant comments. It just happened to be you who brought the last straw... (...) My parts do have problems. Let's have a look at the occurance of my name in the updates lcad0103, 0201, and (...) (23 years ago, 28-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) IIRC, part of what I did to these was to add the type 2 line inside the thin pattern rectangles and subjugate the pattern to subfile. These are techniques that proboably did not exist when you made the original part, so there is absolutely no (...) (23 years ago, 28-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) FWIW, I didn't take your response to Don as childish. You brought up a very valid point. Some responses to your parts that have been "improved" by others: (...) I believe the same thing happened to *all* 3070 parts. The file was not updated (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) Hmm. I'm not sure. My first thought is "honorary reviewers" or "era specialists". If you know of people who've got the parts in question, and they are willing to spend some time reviewing them, we can certainly take their input. Even if they (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) Mail me a list of the old parts you mean, and I'll see what I can do. I can't promise a quick response, but I bet that I can find one of just about anything around here. I have a friend in the area who is a very serious collecter of old stuff. (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) Yes - that would be good. (...) alphabetic. (...) Yep - that would be good even better. (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Chris Dee writes: ( (URL) ) (...) I don't feel bad about improvements made to my old files. That's not my point. But I feel worse and worse about my parts submitted back in March 2002: <Long background> In (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) A problem there is that, looking at the list, many of the parts are rare or ``vintage''. For example, I've been looking at this part recently (URL) a newer version appears in set 4164 (URL) part number 3888). I've been surprised at all the (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
Tore, I know exactly how you feel. I have only submitted a few parts in my time. None of which are good enough. A few had some duplicated line and stuff, which I corrected, resubmitted and were never updated. One was ignored by people and was (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
