Subject:
|
Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:53:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1778 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Chris Dee wrote:
> Yes, this is a bit of a problem (cf. my x778, x779, x791). Is there some way
> that such parts could be highlighted for priority review or review by certain
> reviewers? Or even allow review by fewer people - under the old voting system,
> a part with 1 YES and 20 ABSTAINs would still have got through.
Hmm. I'm not sure.
My first thought is "honorary reviewers" or "era specialists". If you
know of people who've got the parts in question, and they are willing to
spend some time reviewing them, we can certainly take their input. Even
if they don't want to commit to being ongoing reviewers.
> With so many parts on the tracker (a good thing, actually), I find it difficult
> to prioritise my review time. Each time I have time to do some reviewing, I
> start at the top of the the list, and each time there are more and more I have
> to skip over because I don't have the part. If there were some way to filter
> the review list so as to include only those I had not commented on, I could
> just add "novote" entries to those I am unable to review, and my "to do" list
> would shrink.
Would it make sense to have an "abstain" review option? That way, other
people can tell that you aren't going to be reviewing a part.
> Maybe the parts list be sorted in "submit time" order, rather then alphabetic.
> That way the longest waiting files would get greater exposure?
Sure, that's a possibility. How about the option to sort by the longest
"wait time", based on the last time a review was posted for the file?
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
| (...) IIRC, part of what I did to these was to add the type 2 line inside the thin pattern rectangles and subjugate the pattern to subfile. These are techniques that proboably did not exist when you made the original part, so there is absolutely no (...) (22 years ago, 28-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
