Subject:
|
Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 May 2001 13:05:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1198 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Mark Kennedy writes:
> > Sure, but if you're going to submit the hi-res version of 6002.dat then
> > why don't you just submit the new primitives along with it in an MPD
> > file? I think that's reasonable. By the way, do you happen to know if
> > the hi-res sphere primitive has been submitted?
>
> Actualy I think it would be better to submit the primitives seperately so they
> can be used on other models as well, plus it makes the file smaller which was
> why I split the piece up in the first place. I'm somewhat of a byte miser
> trying to minimize the size of pieces, using mirror images and replacing some
> edged quadrilaterals with rectangles. If you want though I would be happy to
> submit the primitives for you.
I was under the impression that you can submit them all as one MPD file
and then someone in charge takes it apart and puts the individual files
in the right directories (as long as the MPD file contains the paths).
After all, LEDIT doesn't handle MPD files.
So yes, I'd appreciate it if you'd submit the primitives with the rest.
I think you should also submit the sphere primitive just in case it
hasn't been submitted yet. Perhaps you could check with Travis Cobbs
about that one?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it.
|
| (...) Actualy I think it would be better to submit the primitives seperately so they can be used on other models as well, plus it makes the file smaller which was why I split the piece up in the first place. I'm somewhat of a byte miser trying to (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
19 Messages in This Thread: ![6002 mpd version, did I do this right? -Mark Kennedy (6-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. -Mark Kennedy (6-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. -Chris Dee (6-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. -Mark Kennedy (7-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. -Don Heyse (7-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. -Don Heyse (7-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. -Don Heyse (8-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. -Mark Kennedy (9-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. -Don Heyse (9-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. -Steve Bliss (9-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. -Mark Kennedy (10-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Some submission guidelines (was: Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it.) -Steve Bliss (10-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Part Authoring FAQ (was Re:Some submission guidelines...) -Don Heyse (11-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![6002, similar to 6909? -Ronald Scott Moody (13-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 6002, similar to 6909? -Mark Kennedy (13-May-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Anybody working on 6909? (Was: 6002, similar to 6909?) -Jacob Sparre Andersen (18-Jul-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Anybody working on 6909? (Was: 6002, similar to 6909?) -Mark Kennedy (19-Jul-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Anybody working on 6909? (Was: 6002, similar to 6909?) -Jacob Sparre Andersen (20-Jul-01 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|