 | | Re: BFC inversion... [DAT]
|
|
Please let me know if this works OK now...... Thanks......... 0 Minifig Torso - SW Blast Armor (Green Plates) 0 Name: 973psb.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2002-04 0 CMDLINE -c7 0 KEYWORDS Star Wars, Boba Fett, bounty hunter, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) If so, then I missed it too (which is entirely possible!) I've never used CERTIFY at the beginning of a file, and TMK it's never been a problem. I use "BFC INVERTNEXT" where necessary, but no blanket CERTIFY statement. Is the inclusion of the (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) Also, is it now standard to repeat the 'CERTIFY' keyword on every BFC line? I thought CERTIFY was only useful once at the beginning of the file? I've been out of the loop, did I miss something? -Kyle (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) Since you used a mirrored reference to the subfiles, you should not need the INVERTNEXT statements. (...) With 2D objects, you should flip & rotate them to show their front face, not use INVERTNEXT. Steve (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | BFC inversion...
|
|
this is the first time I've tried using the "invertnext" BFC statement. would someone plz double check my code? thnx....... (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 973pSB.dat -- Now optimized and BFC'ed [DAT]
|
|
uses these two subfiles: (URL) Minifig Torso - SW Blast Armor (Green Plates) 0 Name: 973psb.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain, based on Matt Schild's original 0 LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2002-04 0 CMDLINE -c7 0 KEYWORDS Star Wars, Boba Fett, bounty hunter, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 973pSB2.dat -- Now optimized and BFC'ed [DAT]
|
|
2nd of 2 subfiles; "main" file will also be posted shortly... 0 ~Minifig Torso - SW Blast Armor (Plates; 1/2) 0 Name: s\973psb2.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain (fwcain@yahoo.com) 0 LDRAW_ORG Subpart UPDATE 2002-04 0 COMMENT Gaps in chest plates for (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 973pSB1.dat -- Now optimized and BFC'ed [DAT]
|
|
1st of 2 subfiles; "main" file will also be posted shortly... 0 ~Minifig Torso - SW Blast Armor (Detail; 1/2) 0 Name: s\973psb1.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 LDRAW_ORG Subpart UPDATE 2002-04 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 0 // 2004-10-04 FWC BFC-ed 4 16 -12 0 (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) How far have you gotten with that? I was working on that one awhile ago, but I never finished it. If you're interested, I can send you what I have. (...) Umm, I've got a 30086c01 (Inflatable Boat) that's finished, but can't be separated into (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) the 4876 Fabuland Slide part. (...) I'm working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset, which is really nasty and wont be finished soon. After that I plan on using the primitives for that one to improve (and BFC) on the other (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Working on 4876.dat Fabuland Slide part
|
|
Dear List, Just to inform other part authors and avoid parallel development, I'm working on the 4876 Fabuland Slide part. (URL) (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | mockup for part 4860new [DAT]
|
|
here is a file i made for a extreme team set. just a mockup ~subfile~ 0 Tyre Single Smooth *4860mu* 0 Name: 7amu.ldr 0 Author: James Jessiman 0 Original LDraw Part - LDraw beta 0.27 Archive 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG 0 0 0 (...) (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating 47457.dat 2x2x2/3 Sloped&Rounded
|
|
(...) T2 is my lazy way of abbreviating "Type 2". T4 = Type 4, etc. I will look into LDScript. Thanks! Edwin :-) Edwin (20 years ago, 2-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating 47457.dat 2x2x2/3 Sloped&Rounded
|
|
(...) The general standard is to go up to 3 decimal places in part files. I agree, main vertices really don't need more than 1 or 2 places. For derived vertices, more precision may be require to keep everything aligned, so going out to 3 places is (...) (20 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating 47457.dat 2x2x2/3 Sloped&Rounded
|
|
(...) Features wish list For the purpose of improved readability in LDAO, I thought of entering each vertex with 2 decimal places. Then I discovered the color-coded vertices in LDDP. It was better, but I still wish the vertices aligned in columns. (...) (20 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) Just a suggestion, maybe the axle primitives could be changed to include a simple 45 degree chamfer there? This would affect quite a few parts, but I doubt there would be many that would need changing if they use the axle primitives as (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) If possible, can you measure the distance diagonally across the minimum radius part of a cross axle? My guess is this problem has shown up because the concave curve at that point of the cross axles has not been modelled in the Ldraw (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating 47457.dat 2x2x2/3 Sloped&Rounded
|
|
I personally round off the numbers to 4 decimals, but I’ve been known to do crazy stuff like modelling in 1/100 (max zoom in mlcad) and use 1-24 parts of high res primitives from time to time. But I would suggest you to round off to (at least) two (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) Thanks for doing this, Niels. Is changing the diameter of these axles from 8 to 7.5 really worth it? They still won't fit in most axleholes, because LDraw's axles don't fit the actual geometry of technic axleholes. However, I am *not* (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels with/without metal axle
|
|
(...) I have measured several of these metal axles with a caliper from different kinds of wheels (studded train wheel with traction teeth, studded train wheel conical hub, spoked train wheel conical hub, spoked train wheel straight hub, studded (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
